<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-19T00:27:28Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/10039" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/10039</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-18T21:14:17Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_ebyu_10000</setSpec><setSpec>col_ebyu_10001</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Anatomical Variations in Major Abdominal Aortic Branches and Sex-Related Differences: A Large-Scale Analysis of 1174 Patients</dc:title><dc:creator>Tokur, Oguzhan</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bingol, Koray</dc:creator><dc:subject>abdominal aorta</dc:subject><dc:subject>anatomical variations</dc:subject><dc:subject>computed tomography angiography</dc:subject><dc:subject>sex-related differences</dc:subject><dc:subject>Adult</dc:subject><dc:subject>Aged</dc:subject><dc:subject>Aged, 80 and over</dc:subject><dc:subject>Anatomic Variation</dc:subject><dc:subject>Aorta, Abdominal</dc:subject><dc:subject>Celiac Artery</dc:subject><dc:subject>Female</dc:subject><dc:subject>Humans</dc:subject><dc:subject>Male</dc:subject><dc:subject>Mesenteric Artery, Inferior</dc:subject><dc:subject>Mesenteric Artery, Superior</dc:subject><dc:subject>Middle Aged</dc:subject><dc:subject>Multidetector Computed Tomography</dc:subject><dc:subject>Prevalence</dc:subject><dc:subject>Retrospective Studies</dc:subject><dc:subject>Sex Factors</dc:subject><dc:subject>anatomical variation</dc:subject><dc:subject>computed tomographic angiography</dc:subject><dc:subject>diagnostic imaging</dc:subject><dc:subject>human</dc:subject><dc:subject>inferior mesenteric artery</dc:subject><dc:subject>procedures</dc:subject><dc:subject>retrospective study</dc:subject><dc:subject>sex factor</dc:subject><dc:subject>superior mesenteric artery</dc:subject><dc:subject>very elderly</dc:subject><dc:description>Background: This study aims to evaluate the prevalence, spectrum, and coexistence of anatomical variations in the major branches of the abdominal aorta using Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) angiography, with a specific emphasis on analyzing sex-related differences in a large-scale cohort. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1174 patients (63.8% male, 36.2% female; mean age 60.54) who underwent abdominal CT angiography between January 2023 and June 2024. Images were acquired using a 128-slice MDCT scanner and reconstructed for detailed vascular assessment. Statistical comparisons between genders were performed using Chi-square and Fisher–Freeman–Halton tests, with p &lt; 0.05 considered significant. Results: The celiac trunk (93.3%), superior mesenteric artery (SMA) (97.1%), and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) (98.5%) predominantly showed classical patterns. However, significant sex-related differences were identified. Females exhibited significantly higher rates of classical patterns for the celiac trunk (96.2% vs. 91.7%), IMA (99.1% vs. 98.1%), right hepatic artery (RHA) (91.5% vs. 82.6%), and left hepatic artery (LHA) (95.8% vs. 85.4%). Conversely, males showed a higher prevalence of complex variations, including replaced/accessory hepatic arteries and the absence of the common hepatic artery. The number of right and left renal arteries was similar between sexes and did not show a significant difference, while horseshoe kidney was detected only in males. Conclusions: Abdominal vascular structures adhere to classical anatomy more frequently in females, while males exhibit greater morphological variability. These findings emphasize the necessity of gender-specific preoperative vascular mapping to optimize surgical outcomes and reduce morbidity. © 2026 by the authors.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10039</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography12040051</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>2379-1381</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>Tomography</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/ebyu/10039</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>