<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-18T23:15:05Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/10071" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/10071</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-18T20:49:48Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_ebyu_10000</setSpec><setSpec>col_ebyu_10001</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Attention Enhanced Deep Learning for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Classification: A Comparative Ablation Study</dc:title><dc:creator>Taş, Mehmet Bilge Han</dc:creator><dc:creator>Öztepe, Muhammet Fırat</dc:creator><dc:subject>attention mechanism</dc:subject><dc:subject>brain tumor classification</dc:subject><dc:subject>Deep learning</dc:subject><dc:subject>fine-tuning</dc:subject><dc:subject>transfer learning</dc:subject><dc:description>Objective: The performance of models was evaluated using an ablation-based approach employing attention mechanisms and transfer learning for tumor classification in brain magnetic resonance imaging images. Methods: The glioma, meningioma, no tumor, and pituitary classes from the BRISC2025 public dataset were used. ResNet50, DenseNet121, EfficientNetB0, Xception, and InceptionResNetV2 models were tested using a baseline and the squeeze-and-excitation (SE) attention, spatial attention, and convolutional block attention module attention constructs. The models were trained in two phases: frozen backbone training and fine-tuning, with each experiment repeated three times. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, area under the curve (AUC), and loss values. Results: The most successful model was EfficientNetB0 + SE Attention. This model achieved an accuracy of 0.9580 ± 0.0062, an F1-score of 0.9580 ± 0.0057, and an AUC of 0.9949 ± 0.0012 on the test set. Class-based results showed particularly high success rates for the no-tumor and pituitary classes. The most challenging class was meningioma. Conclusion: Transfer learning models supported by attention mechanisms have yielded successful results in brain tumor magnetic resonance classification. The EfficientNetB0 + SE Attention model stood out as the most balanced and successful architecture among the evaluated methods. © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Galenos Publishing House on behalf of the Turkish Society of Magnetic Resonance.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Galenos Publishing House</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10071</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.4274/currresmri.2026.26146</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>2822-2318</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>Current Research in MRI</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/ebyu/10071</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>