<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-18T23:15:57Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/10197" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/10197</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-18T20:25:27Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_ebyu_10000</setSpec><setSpec>col_ebyu_10001</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Mono- and Bis-Ureido Sulfapyridines as Nanomolar Dual Cholinesterase Inhibitors: Enzyme Kinetics, Molecular Docking, and ADME/Tox Insights</dc:title><dc:creator>Yapar, Gönül</dc:creator><dc:creator>Akocak, Suleyman</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lolak, Nebih</dc:creator><dc:creator>Topal, Meryem</dc:creator><dc:creator>Türkeş, Cüneyt</dc:creator><dc:creator>Topal, Fevzi</dc:creator><dc:creator>Durgun, Mustafa</dc:creator><dc:creator>Koçyiğit, Ümit Muhammet</dc:creator><dc:creator>Işık, Mesut</dc:creator><dc:creator>Beydemir, Şükrü</dc:creator><dc:subject>Alzheimer's disease</dc:subject><dc:subject>bis-compounds</dc:subject><dc:subject>cholinesterase</dc:subject><dc:subject>sulfapyridine</dc:subject><dc:subject>ureido</dc:subject><dc:description>A series of mono- and bis-ureido sulfapyridine derivatives (SP-1–SP-10) were synthesized and evaluated as dual cholinesterase inhibitors targeting acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE). All compounds exhibited nanomolar inhibition. The most potent AChE inhibitors were SP-8 (Ki = 5.25 ± 0.73 nM), SP-9 (5.09 ± 0.44 nM), and SP-10 (5.74 ± 0.55 nM), significantly outperforming tacrine (Ki = 105.03 ± 8.85 nM) under identical conditions. For BChE, SP-9 showed the strongest inhibition (Ki = 26.38 ± 2.07 nM) compared with tacrine (172.03 ± 32.42 nM). Kinetic analyses revealed competitive inhibition toward AChE for all derivatives, whereas BChE inhibition displayed both competitive and noncompetitive patterns depending on structural features. Glide XP docking using AChE (PDB: 7XN1) and BChE (PDB: 4BDS), complemented by MM-GBSA binding free energy calculations, supported favorable ligand accommodation within the catalytic pockets and highlighted the importance of aromatic and hydrophobic interactions. In silico ADME/Tox analysis revealed a potency–drug-likeness trade-off: mono-ureido derivatives complied with Lipinski's rule of five and showed high predicted oral absorption, whereas bis-ureido derivatives, despite superior enzymatic potency, exhibited multiple drug-likeness violations. These findings identify the ureido–sulfapyridine scaffold as a potent enzymatic dual cholinesterase inhibitory framework, warranting further structural optimization to improve pharmacokinetic properties. © 2026 Wiley-VCH GmbH.</dc:description><dc:publisher>John Wiley and Sons Inc</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10197</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202507119</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>2365-6549</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>ChemistrySelect</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/ebyu/10197</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>