<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-18T23:47:37Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/10328" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/10328</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-18T20:36:51Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_ebyu_10000</setSpec><setSpec>col_ebyu_10001</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Machine Learning-Based Performance Analysis of Solar Thermal Storage Tanks with Fin-Configured Phase Change Materials</dc:title><dc:creator>Çolak, Andaç Batur</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kılınç, Cuma</dc:creator><dc:subject>artificial neural networks</dc:subject><dc:subject>Bayesian Regularization</dc:subject><dc:subject>latent heat energy storage</dc:subject><dc:subject>paraffin wax</dc:subject><dc:subject>surrogate modeling</dc:subject><dc:subject>Bayesian networks</dc:subject><dc:subject>Computational fluid dynamics</dc:subject><dc:subject>Digital storage</dc:subject><dc:subject>Fins (heat exchange)</dc:subject><dc:subject>Heat storage</dc:subject><dc:subject>Learning systems</dc:subject><dc:subject>Machine learning</dc:subject><dc:subject>Mean square error</dc:subject><dc:subject>Optimization</dc:subject><dc:subject>Solar concentrators</dc:subject><dc:subject>Solar energy</dc:subject><dc:subject>Solar heating</dc:subject><dc:subject>Storage (materials)</dc:subject><dc:subject>Thermal conductivity</dc:subject><dc:subject>Thermal energy</dc:subject><dc:subject>Vertical stabilizers</dc:subject><dc:subject>Heat distribution</dc:subject><dc:subject>Liquid fraction</dc:subject><dc:subject>Machine-learning</dc:subject><dc:subject>Neural-networks</dc:subject><dc:subject>Phase Change</dc:subject><dc:subject>Reynold number</dc:subject><dc:subject>Storage tank</dc:subject><dc:subject>Latent heat</dc:subject><dc:subject>Neural networks</dc:subject><dc:description>Solar thermal energy storage systems play a vital role in bridging the gap between intermittent solar availability and continuous energy demand; however, their efficiency is severely constrained by the inherently low thermal conductivity of phase change materials. Integrating physical heat transfer enhancements, such as radial fins, offers a practical solution, but evaluating these non-linear thermal dynamics across diverse design configurations typically incurs heavy computational costs. To address this challenge, this research investigates an artificial intelligence-based predictive framework capable of accurately modeling complex phase change dynamics in fin-configured storage tanks. Utilizing high-fidelity 2D Computational Fluid Dynamics simulation data of a stainless-steel double-tube storage tank filled with RT-50 paraffin wax across 10, 20, and 29 fin configurations, a Multi-Layer Perceptron Artificial Neural Network trained with the Bayesian Regularization algorithm was developed. The model predicts liquid fraction, latent heat distribution, and buoyancy-driven natural convection (Reynolds number) based on fin count and time. The optimal architecture, featuring 30 hidden neurons, achieved exceptional predictive precision, yielding a coefficient of determination of 0.99999, along with individual Mean Squared Error values of 1.29 × 10−3 for liquid fraction, 5.73 × 10−1 for latent heat distribution, and 2.64 × 10−5 for Reynolds number, with average prediction deviation rates consistently below 0.5%. These results demonstrate that high-precision surrogate modeling can effectively replace computationally intensive numerical simulations, offering significant practical implications for the real-time thermal monitoring, rapid design optimization, and intelligent control of advanced solar energy storage technologies. © 2026 by the authors.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10328</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.3390/en19174169</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>1996-1073</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>Energies</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/ebyu/10328</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>