<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-18T23:53:57Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/10845" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/10845</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-18T21:13:19Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_ebyu_10000</setSpec><setSpec>col_ebyu_10001</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Comparison of artifact values of prosthodontic materials with 2 different cone beam computed tomography devices</dc:title><dc:creator>Naralan, Muhammed Enes</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ozdogan, Alper</dc:creator><dc:creator>Guller, Mustafa Taha</dc:creator><dc:creator>Miloglu, Ozkan</dc:creator><dc:subject>Artifacts</dc:subject><dc:subject>Ceramics</dc:subject><dc:subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</dc:subject><dc:subject>Dental Materials</dc:subject><dc:subject>Humans</dc:subject><dc:subject>In Vitro Techniques</dc:subject><dc:subject>Zirconium</dc:subject><dc:subject>dental material</dc:subject><dc:subject>zirconium oxide</dc:subject><dc:subject>artifact</dc:subject><dc:subject>chemistry</dc:subject><dc:subject>comparative study</dc:subject><dc:subject>cone beam computed tomography</dc:subject><dc:subject>devices</dc:subject><dc:subject>human</dc:subject><dc:subject>in vitro study</dc:subject><dc:subject>procedures</dc:subject><dc:description>Statement of problem: Prosthodontic materials may cause unexpected artifacts in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, but studies quantifying these artifacts are sparse. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the artifact expression of fixed prosthodontic materials with different CBCT devices. Material and methods: Ten prosthodontic materials (Co-Cr-Mo alloy, interim acrylic resin, polyetheretherketone, feldspathic ceramic, lithium disilicate glass-ceramic, zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic, zircon core, and 3 monolithic zirconias) were scanned with 2 CBCT devices. The materials were placed in polymethyl methacrylate resin to simulate clinical conditions. To assess the impact of the devices on artifacts, the gray values of 8 areas in each material image were analyzed. The data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests (α=.05). Results: Statistically significant differences were found in the artifact expression of the materials (P&lt;.001) and between CBCT devices (P&lt;.001). Conclusions: The artifact expression of polymeric and ceramic materials in CBCT images was less than that of other materials. The milliampere-second (mAs) value of CBCT devices had a significant impact on the artifact level. © 2025 Editorial Council for The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</dc:description><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10845</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.08.003</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>0022-3913</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/ebyu/10845</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>