<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-19T01:35:51Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/11021" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/11021</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-18T21:13:14Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_ebyu_10000</setSpec><setSpec>col_ebyu_10001</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Effect of Sertraline and Vortioxetine on Stress-Induced Brain Injury in Rats: Biochemical and Histopathological Evaluations</dc:title><dc:creator>Cim, Emine Fusun Akyuz</dc:creator><dc:creator>Suleyman, Zeynep</dc:creator><dc:creator>Suleyman, Halis</dc:creator><dc:creator>Yazici, Gulce Naz</dc:creator><dc:creator>Coban, Taha Abdulkadir</dc:creator><dc:subject>antioxidant</dc:subject><dc:subject>brain injury</dc:subject><dc:subject>oxidant</dc:subject><dc:subject>oxidative stress</dc:subject><dc:subject>sertraline</dc:subject><dc:subject>stress</dc:subject><dc:subject>vortioxetine</dc:subject><dc:subject>Animals</dc:subject><dc:subject>Brain</dc:subject><dc:subject>Brain Injuries</dc:subject><dc:subject>Disease Models, Animal</dc:subject><dc:subject>Glutathione</dc:subject><dc:subject>Male</dc:subject><dc:subject>Malondialdehyde</dc:subject><dc:subject>Rats</dc:subject><dc:subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</dc:subject><dc:subject>Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors</dc:subject><dc:subject>Stress, Psychological</dc:subject><dc:subject>ketamine</dc:subject><dc:subject>malonaldehyde</dc:subject><dc:subject>serotonin uptake inhibitor</dc:subject><dc:subject>animal cell</dc:subject><dc:subject>animal experiment</dc:subject><dc:subject>animal model</dc:subject><dc:subject>animal tissue</dc:subject><dc:subject>Article</dc:subject><dc:subject>astrocyte</dc:subject><dc:subject>brain biochemistry</dc:subject><dc:subject>brain protection</dc:subject><dc:subject>cerebral cortical tissue</dc:subject><dc:description>Objectives: Our aim was to evaluate the comparative effects of sertraline and vortioxetine against stress-induced brain injury in rats. Methods: The rats were assigned to a nonstress group (NSG), stress-treated control (StC), sertraline + stress (SSt), and vortioxetine + stress (VSt) groups. Sertraline and vortioxetine (10 mg/kg) were given orally by gavage to the SSt and VSt groups. One hour later, all animals (except NSG) underwent forced immobilization to establish a stress model (2 hours). The drugs were given once a day for 30 days. The animals were killed with ketamine 150 mg/kg, and tissues were removed from the cerebral cortex. One-way analysis of variance and Fisher post hoc least significant difference were conducted for the analysis. Results: The malondialdehyde (nmol/mL) level was 2.58 ± 0.48 in the NSG, 8.09 ± 0.57 in the StC, 3.84 ± 0.53 in the SSt, and 2.84 ± 0.20 in the VSt group (P &lt; 0.0002). The total glutathione (mmol/g) was 7.15 ± 0.59 in the NSG, 2.41 ± 0.43 in the StC, 4.58 ± 0.26 in the SSt, and 5.98 ± 0.13 in the VSt (P &lt; 0.0002). The total oxidant status (mmol H2O2Eq/L) level was 3.56 ± 0.20 in the NSG, 9.99 ± 0.74 in the StC, 4.97 ± 0.39 in the SSt, and 3.81 ± 0.31 in the VSt (P &lt; 0.0002). The total antioxidant status (mmolTroloxEq/L) level was 8.65 ± 0.37 in the NSG, 3.04 ± 0.22 in the StC, 6.29 ± 0.34 in the SSt, and 7.61 ± 0.40 in the VSt (P &lt; 0.0002). Sertraline reduced pericellular edema in astrocytes and oligodendrocytes and decreased perivascular edema, dilatation, and congestion of blood vessels, whereas these were not seen with vortioxetine. Conclusions: Compared with sertraline, vortioxetine is a neuroprotective antidepressant with higher antioxidant activity and can more effectively prevent stress-induced brain tissue injury. Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Lippincott Williams and Wilkins</dc:publisher><dc:date>2024</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11021</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.1097/wnf.0000000000000615</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>0362-5664</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>Clinical Neuropharmacology</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/ebyu/11021</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>