2026-10-19T01:03:03Zhttps://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request

oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/112172026-10-18T20:26:17Zopenairedrivercom_ebyu_10000col_ebyu_10001

Irrigation water quality classification using boosting and CNN-BiGRU-Attention models: feature importance assessment using Hellinger distanceZerouali, BilelDerdour, AbdessamedAlmalki, Abdulrahman SerajKatipoglu, Okan MertArafat, Ahmed A.Santos, Celso Augusto GuimarãesBailek, NadjemHussein, Enas E.Chi-squarefeature selectionmutual information scoresensitivity analysisstrong performancewater quality managementAdaptive boostingClassification (of information)Deep learningInformation managementIrrigationLearning systemsOptimizationQuality controlQuality managementRisk assessmentRisk managementWater conservationWater managementFeatures selectionHellinger distanceLearning modelsMutual informationsPerformanceSensitivity analyzesartificial neural networkclassificationirrigation systemwater qualityFeature extractionThis study addresses a gap in irrigation water quality classification by comparing machine learning (ML) algorithms and deep learning (DL) models, with a focus on feature selection. Feature relevance was assessed using Hellinger distance, mutual information, and Chi-square analysis. Classifiers included boosting algorithms (AdaBoost, XGBoost, CatBoost, LightGBM, GradientBoosting, HistGradientBoosting), Extra Trees, and DL models (CNN-BiGRU and CNN-BiGRU-Attention). Performance was evaluated using standard metrics on 166 samples from Algeria’s Naama region. DL models achieved the highest accuracies (0.82–0.84) and AUC scores (0.98–0.981), followed by XGBoost and CatBoost. Feature analysis identified qiCl as most impactful (Hellinger distance = 0.248), and qiNa as most informative (mutual information= 1.0212). These findings underscore the strength of DL approaches and the value of integrated feature selection. The results offer practical insights for optimizing irrigation strategies, supporting risk assessment, and guiding sustainable water resource management. © 2025 IAHS.Taylor and Francis Ltd.2025Articlehttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11217https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2025.25748640262-6667enHydrological Sciences Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/ebyu/11217