<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-19T01:05:07Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/12421" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/12421</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-18T21:13:28Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_ebyu_10000</setSpec><setSpec>col_ebyu_10001</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Efficacy of prolotherapy and arthrocentesis in management of temporomandibular joint hypermobility</dc:title><dc:creator>Taşkesen, Fatih</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cezairli, Burak</dc:creator><dc:subject>arthrocentesis</dc:subject><dc:subject>Prolotherapy</dc:subject><dc:subject>temporomandibular joint</dc:subject><dc:subject>Glucose</dc:subject><dc:subject>Humans</dc:subject><dc:subject>Injections, Intra-Articular</dc:subject><dc:subject>Pain</dc:subject><dc:subject>Range of Motion, Articular</dc:subject><dc:subject>Temporomandibular Joint Disorders</dc:subject><dc:subject>Treatment Outcome</dc:subject><dc:subject>human</dc:subject><dc:subject>intraarticular drug administration</dc:subject><dc:subject>range of motion</dc:subject><dc:subject>temporomandibular joint disorder</dc:subject><dc:description>Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy in conjunction with arthrocentesis and dextrose prolotherapy alone in the management of symptomatic TMJ hypermobility. Methods: Twenty-four patients suffering from TMJ symptomatic hypermobility received 10% dextrose injections for three sessions at four-week intervals. Twelve patients (P group) received prolotherapy alone; the other 12 (PA group) also underwent a single arthrocentesis session. Patients were evaluated for maximal incisal opening, maximal incisal opening without pain, pain at rest, pain during chewing function, TMJ sound, and locking episode frequency. Results: Pain scores were significantly reduced in both groups, and the locking episode frequency was decreased to a greater extent in the PA than the P group, at both the short and long terms. Conclusion: Prolotherapy is effective in the management of TMJ hypermobility. However, prolotherapy with arthrocentesis may be superior to prolotherapy alone in the management of TMJ hypermobility. © 2020 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Taylor and Francis Ltd.</dc:publisher><dc:date>2023</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12421</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2020.1861887</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>0886-9634</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>Cranio - Journal of Craniomandibular and Sleep Practice</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/ebyu/12421</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>