2026-10-18T23:56:57Zhttps://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request

oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/130922026-10-18T21:13:26Zopenairedrivercom_ebyu_10000col_ebyu_10001

Relationship between urolithiasis and the fat halo signKeskin, ErcümentErdoğan, AbdullahKoçak, MehmetTuran, AbdullahBody Mass IndexHumansRetrospective StudiesUreteral CalculiUrinary CalculiUrolithiasischolesterolcreatininetriacylglyceroladultArticlebody heightbody massbody weightcholesterol blood levelcomputer assisted tomographycreatinine blood levelfemaleflank paingendergroups by agehumanmajor clinical studymalemiddle agedretrospective studytriacylglycerol blood levelurea nitrogen blood levelureter stonediagnostic imagingIntroduction: This study aimed to examine the relationship between urolithiasis and gastric wall fat halo sign (FHS). Materials and method: The data of 382 patients who presented to our clinic with the complaint of flank pain were analyzed retrospectively. According to the results of noncontrast computed tomography, the patients were divided into two groups those with ureteral stones (Group 1) and those without urinary stones (Group 2). The patients' age, gender, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), cholesterol, triglyceride, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and gastric wall FHS data were evaluated. Results: When Groups 1 and 2 were compared in terms of FHS positivity, FHS was detected in 140 (57.3%) of 244 patients in Group 1 and 24 (17%) of 138 patients in Group 2, indicating a statistically significant difference (P <.001). Conclusion: A statistically significant relationship was found between urinary stone disease and gastric wall FHS. © 2021 John Wiley & Sons LtdJohn Wiley and Sons Inc2021Articlehttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13092https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.144531368-5031enInternational Journal of Clinical Practiceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/ebyu/13092