<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-19T01:05:09Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/16763" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/16763</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-18T20:56:45Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_ebyu_10000</setSpec><setSpec>col_ebyu_10001</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Investigation of Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Restorations After Different Surface Treatments</dc:title><dc:creator>Akar, Turker</dc:creator><dc:creator>Akin, Hakan</dc:creator><dc:subject>Dental implants</dc:subject><dc:subject>dental lasers</dc:subject><dc:subject>fracture strength test</dc:subject><dc:subject>surface treatments</dc:subject><dc:subject>CAD/CAM</dc:subject><dc:subject>BIAXIAL FLEXURAL STRENGTH</dc:subject><dc:subject>Y-TZP ZIRCONIA</dc:subject><dc:subject>PHASE-TRANSFORMATION</dc:subject><dc:subject>MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR</dc:subject><dc:subject>BOND STRENGTH</dc:subject><dc:subject>RESIN CEMENT</dc:subject><dc:subject>ROUGHNESS</dc:subject><dc:subject>CERAMICS</dc:subject><dc:subject>RELIABILITY</dc:subject><dc:subject>Medicine, Research &amp; Experimental</dc:subject><dc:subject>Research &amp; Experimental Medicine</dc:subject><dc:description>Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the different surface treatments on fracture strength of the zirconia-based ceramic restorations. Methods: Each of 120 dental implant abutments and analogs were used in the present study. Zirconia core materials were manufactured on dental implants by using CAD/CAM device and they were randomly divided into 6 groups (n=20) according to surface pretreatments; control group (Group C), airborne-particle abrasion (Group AA), silica-coating (Group SC), Nd:YAG laser (Group N), bur-cut from cervical region (Group BC), and bur-cut on the functional tubercule (Group BT). Cementation was succeeded with two different types of cements including a dual-cure resin-cement and a glass ionomer cement. The obtained data were evaluated statistically using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p=0.05). Results: No statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p&gt;0.05). Similarly, no statistically significant difference was found between the resin cement and glass ionomer groups with respect to fracture strength values (p&gt;0.05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, surface treatments and cement have no effect on the flexural strength of zirconia ceramic crowns.</dc:description><dc:publisher>MARMARA UNIV, INST HEALTH SCIENCES</dc:publisher><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/16763</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.796603</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>2459-1459</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/ebyu/16763</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>