<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-19T01:56:11Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/17143" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/17143</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-18T20:49:20Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_ebyu_10000</setSpec><setSpec>col_ebyu_10001</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Diagnostic Comparison of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy and Systematic Biopsy in PI-RADS 4-5 Prostate Lesions</dc:title><dc:creator>levent, akın</dc:creator><dc:creator>DURMAZ, ÖNDER</dc:creator><dc:subject>Üroloji ve Nefroloji</dc:subject><dc:subject>Radyoloji</dc:subject><dc:subject>Nükleer Tıp</dc:subject><dc:subject>Tıbbi Görüntüleme</dc:subject><dc:description>Objective: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has transformed prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis by enabling lesion-targeted biopsies. The optimal biopsy approach—systematic biopsy (SB), MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (TB), or their combination (CB)—remains debated, especially in patients with high-risk Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4-5 lesions. This study compared these strategies for detecting overall and csPCa. Methods: This retrospective study included 330 patients who underwent MRI-ultrasound fusion TB with 12-core SB between July 2022 and May 2025. Only lesions classified as PI-RADS v2.1 category 4 or 5 were analyzed. Detection rates of overall PCa and csPCa (Gleason score ≥ 7) were compared among SB, TB, and CB. Subgroup analyses were performed by PI-RADS category and lesion location (anterior, middle, posterior). Logistic regression identified independent predictors of csPCa. Results: A total of 429 lesions were evaluated. Overall, PCa detection rates were 62% for SB, 70% for TB, and 77% for CB (P &lt; 0.001); the corresponding csPCa rates were 47%, 56%, and 63% (P &lt; 0.001). TB detected csPCa more effectively than SB (56% vs. 47%, P &lt; 0.01). PI-RADS 5 lesions had higher detection rates than PI-RADS 4 lesions across all methods. CB achieved the highest rates in all locations, especially in anterior and middle lesions. Age, positive digital rectal examination, prostate-specific antigen density, prior biopsy, and PI-RADS category 5 were independent predictors of csPCa. Conclusion: In PI-RADS 4–5 lesions, combined SB and TB provide the highest detection rate for csPCa. While TB improves selective detection, SB remains essential to avoid missing significant disease.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/17143</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.4274/abcr.2026.26420</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>2687-4520</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>Archives of Basic and Clinical Research</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/ebyu/17143</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>