<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-19T01:07:52Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/17371" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/17371</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-18T20:49:29Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_ebyu_10000</setSpec><setSpec>col_ebyu_10001</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Comparison Of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) And Frequency Ratio (FR) Methods In Landslide Susceptibility Assessment: A Case Study In Kemah-Kömür Stream Basin, Erzincan</dc:title><dc:creator>taş, mehmet akif</dc:creator><dc:subject>Coğrafya</dc:subject><dc:subject>Çevre Bilimleri</dc:subject><dc:description>This study compares the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Frequency Ratio (FR) methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kömür Stream Basin, Kemah-Erzincan. The performance of the models was comprehensively evaluated using metrics including the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, F1-Score, and overlap rate analysis. The results revealed that the statistics-based FR model Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.884, F1-Score = 0.87 significantly outperformed the expert opinion-based AHP model (AUC = 0.699, F1-Score = 0.68) for across all metrics. In the overlap rate analysis, which demonstrates the practical validity of the models, 92.7% of the existing landslide areas fell within the 'High' and 'Very High' susceptibility classes on the FR map compared to 73.7% on the AHP map. These findings prove that the FR method is a reliable and precise tool for identifying high-risk areas and for land-use planning in the region.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/17371</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.51800/ecd.1761885</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>1300-5634</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>EGE COĞRAFYA DERGİSİ</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/ebyu/17371</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>