<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-19T01:52:55Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/19516" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:ebyu/19516</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-18T21:11:44Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_ebyu_10000</setSpec><setSpec>col_ebyu_10001</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Can Indirect Inflammatory Markers Differentiate Brucella Epididymo-Orchitis From Non-Brucella Epididymo-Orchitis?</dc:title><dc:creator>ERDOĞAN, ABDULLAH</dc:creator><dc:creator>polat, salih</dc:creator><dc:subject>Genel ve Dahili Tıp</dc:subject><dc:subject>Üroloji ve Nefroloji</dc:subject><dc:description>Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the value of direct and indirect markers showing inf-lammation in the diagnosis of Brucella epidid-ymo-orchitis (BEO) and its differentiation from non-Brucella epididymo-orchitis.Material and Methods: A total of 152 pa-tients that presented to our clinic with acute sc-rotal complaints and were diagnosed with epidid-ymo-orchitis between January 2015 and January 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Excluded from the study were 15 patients with a hemato-logic disease, coronary artery disease or malig-nant diagnosis, eight patients aged below 18 years, and 13 patients whose hemogram and C-reactive protein (CRP) values were not available in their medical records. The diagnosis of epididymo-or-chitis was based on laboratory (leukocytosis, CRP elevation) and radiological findings. The diagnosis of BEO was defined as ≥1/160 titer value and/or positive blood culture in the standard tube aggluti-nation (STA) test in addition to orchitis symptoms and signs.Results: The median WBC (p=0.033), neut-rophil (p=0.013) and monocyte (p=0.006) counts and NL (p=0.014) and ML (p=0.002) ratios were statistically significantly lower in the BEO group. The ML ratio had the highest predictive value with an AUC of 0.725 (95% CI = 0.146-0.424; p=0.002), as well as high specificity (97.3%) and diagnostic accuracy (83.5%) in predicting a BEO diagnosis. No parameter was an independent factor in the differentiation of BEO and NBEO.Conclusions: Easy, fast and low-cost hemoto-logical inflammatory markers provide diagnostic benefits complementing serological tests in dis-tinguishing BEO from NBEO cases. In particular, MLR has a high diagnostic accuracy compared to other parameters.</dc:description><dc:date>2020</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/19516</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.558089</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>1305-2489</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>Yeni Üroloji Dergisi</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://ebyu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/ebyu/19516</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>