AI in Higher Education: When Do University Students Consider It Ethical or Unethical?

Book ChapterAçık Erişim

Özet

This chapter investigated the ethical dimensions of artificial intelligence (AI) use in higher education through the perspective of university students. Using a qualitative research method, this study analyzed responses elicited from a group of English Language Teaching (ELT) students to explore how they conceptualized ethical boundaries when using AI in academic tasks. The findings revealed that students developed a foundational ethical framework distinguishing between assistive AI use (e.g., brainstorming and proofreading) and substitutive ones (e.g., completing assignments or homework). Most ELT students identified a threshold of 25–30% as an acceptable level of AI assistance in academic tasks. Their ethical judgments were affected by such factors as the amount of personal contribution, the nature of tasks, the intent of using AI, and transparency considerations. Students perceived ethical AI use as something that supported rather than replaced their intellectual engagement, while they defined unethical AI use as direct copying and complete reliance on AI tools. This chapter, therefore, contributes to our understanding of the recent ethical discussion of AI use in higher education and offers targeted recommendations for students, academics, and institutions. © 2026 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, Genthiner Straße 13, 10785 Berlin

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10612Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112206393-004Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorGönülal, Talip
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:25:47.849707069Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:25:47.849707069Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractThis chapter investigated the ethical dimensions of artificial intelligence (AI) use in higher education through the perspective of university students. Using a qualitative research method, this study analyzed responses elicited from a group of English Language Teaching (ELT) students to explore how they conceptualized ethical boundaries when using AI in academic tasks. The findings revealed that students developed a foundational ethical framework distinguishing between assistive AI use (e.g., brainstorming and proofreading) and substitutive ones (e.g., completing assignments or homework). Most ELT students identified a threshold of 25–30% as an acceptable level of AI assistance in academic tasks. Their ethical judgments were affected by such factors as the amount of personal contribution, the nature of tasks, the intent of using AI, and transparency considerations. Students perceived ethical AI use as something that supported rather than replaced their intellectual engagement, while they defined unethical AI use as direct copying and complete reliance on AI tools. This chapter, therefore, contributes to our understanding of the recent ethical discussion of AI use in higher education and offers targeted recommendations for students, academics, and institutions. © 2026 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, Genthiner Straße 13, 10785 Berlin
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/9783112206393-004
dc.identifier.endpage79
dc.identifier.isbn978-311220639-3; 978-311914829-0
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105043456363
dc.identifier.startpage63
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10612
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDe Gruyter
dc.relation.ispartofArtificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Generative AI, Personalized Learning, Digital Transformation
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectacademic integrity
dc.subjectAI ethics
dc.subjectethical AI use
dc.subjecthigher education
dc.subjectstudent perceptions
dc.subjectunethical AI use
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence
dc.subjectEducation computing
dc.subjectEthical technology
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence ethic
dc.subjectAssistive
dc.subjectEnglish language teaching
dc.subjectEthical artificial intelligence use
dc.subjectHigh educations
dc.subjectQualitative research methods
dc.subjectUnethical artificial intelligence use
dc.subjectUniversity students
dc.subjectStudents
dc.titleAI in Higher Education: When Do University Students Consider It Ethical or Unethical?
dc.typeBook Chapter
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus1
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS