Does Voiding in a Standing Position Cause Benign Prostate Hyperplasia?

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Background: Benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) is a common health problem amongst men worldwide. It has a multifactorial ethiology, and in some societies, urinating in a standing position is believed to cause BPH. Although the effect of urination position on voiding parameters has been extensively investigated, whether they have a role in the aetiology of BPH is not known. Material and Methods: The patients who had (n = 89) and had not ever used (n = 213) alpha-blockers were included in the study. All patients were divided into four groups in accordance with their past urination habits: Group 1 (I always pee in a standing position), group 2 (I mostly pee in a standing position), group 3 (I mostly pee in a sitting position) and group 4 (I always pee in a sitting position). The current uroflowmetry results, prostate volumes (PVs) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of the groups were compared. Results: The IPSSs of groups 1–4 (total n = 213) who had not used alpha-blockers before were 10 (9–16), 10 (7–14), 10 (7–14) and 10 (8–13) points, respectively; Their median PVs were 40, 35, 40 and 40 mL, respectively; And their average maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) values were 17 (12.7–20.5), 1.46 (11.1–20), 15 (12.4–18.9) and 15.6 (11.7–19.5) mL/s, respectively. No statistical difference was observed between the groups. Alpha-blockers were started in 104 patients who had not used alpha-blockers before in accordance with their clinical results. When these 104 patients who were started on alpha-blockers for the first time and 89 patients who were started on alpha-blockers before were examined together, the average ages of starting alpha-blockers were 59.9 ± 7.1, 60.5 ± 6.7, 59.6 ± 6.5 and 60.8 ± 6.7 years. No statistical difference was observed between the groups. Patients with and without clinical BPH were compared in terms of past urination habits. In both groups, the rates of patients who always or mostly urinated whilst sitting (60%–61%) and those of patients who always or mostly urinated whilst standing (39%–40%) were similar. Conclusions: This retrospective study showed that positional urination habits do not have a role in the aetiology of BPH. However, multicentre prospective studies with a larger patient population are needed. © 2025 The Author(s).

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11198Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorAykanli, Emre
dc.contributor.authorYavuzsan, Abdullah Hizir
dc.contributor.authorBuyuktepe, Omer
dc.contributor.authorAltunok, Vedat
dc.contributor.authorBalikci, Aysenur
dc.contributor.authorKocoglu, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorKoncuk, Mustafa Serkan
dc.contributor.authorAtalay, Numan
dc.contributor.authorTurkmen, Nihat
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:26:17.136924986Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:26:17.136924986Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractBackground: Benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) is a common health problem amongst men worldwide. It has a multifactorial ethiology, and in some societies, urinating in a standing position is believed to cause BPH. Although the effect of urination position on voiding parameters has been extensively investigated, whether they have a role in the aetiology of BPH is not known. Material and Methods: The patients who had (n = 89) and had not ever used (n = 213) alpha-blockers were included in the study. All patients were divided into four groups in accordance with their past urination habits: Group 1 (I always pee in a standing position), group 2 (I mostly pee in a standing position), group 3 (I mostly pee in a sitting position) and group 4 (I always pee in a sitting position). The current uroflowmetry results, prostate volumes (PVs) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of the groups were compared. Results: The IPSSs of groups 1–4 (total n = 213) who had not used alpha-blockers before were 10 (9–16), 10 (7–14), 10 (7–14) and 10 (8–13) points, respectively; Their median PVs were 40, 35, 40 and 40 mL, respectively; And their average maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) values were 17 (12.7–20.5), 1.46 (11.1–20), 15 (12.4–18.9) and 15.6 (11.7–19.5) mL/s, respectively. No statistical difference was observed between the groups. Alpha-blockers were started in 104 patients who had not used alpha-blockers before in accordance with their clinical results. When these 104 patients who were started on alpha-blockers for the first time and 89 patients who were started on alpha-blockers before were examined together, the average ages of starting alpha-blockers were 59.9 ± 7.1, 60.5 ± 6.7, 59.6 ± 6.5 and 60.8 ± 6.7 years. No statistical difference was observed between the groups. Patients with and without clinical BPH were compared in terms of past urination habits. In both groups, the rates of patients who always or mostly urinated whilst sitting (60%–61%) and those of patients who always or mostly urinated whilst standing (39%–40%) were similar. Conclusions: This retrospective study showed that positional urination habits do not have a role in the aetiology of BPH. However, multicentre prospective studies with a larger patient population are needed. © 2025 The Author(s).
dc.identifier.doi10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257802.16
dc.identifier.eissn1576-8260
dc.identifier.endpage120
dc.identifier.issn0004-0614
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pmid40191852
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105001713421
dc.identifier.startpage115
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11198
dc.identifier.volume78
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001462677400001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIniestares, S.A.
dc.relation.ispartofArchivos Espanoles de Urologia
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectBPH
dc.subjectetymology
dc.subjectvoiding position
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectProstatic Hyperplasia
dc.subjectStanding Position
dc.subjectUrination
dc.subjectetiology
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmicturition
dc.subjectpathophysiology
dc.subjectprostate hypertrophy
dc.subjectstanding
dc.titleDoes Voiding in a Standing Position Cause Benign Prostate Hyperplasia?
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.departmentDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, 24100 Erzincan, Turkey.
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)