Detection of the glenoid bare spot by non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, and 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography: comparison with CT arthrography

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Objectives: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, and 3D T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) MR arthrography sequences as compared with a CT arthrography in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot. Methods: A retrospective study of 216 patients who underwent non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, VIBE MRI arthrography, and CT arthrogram between January 2011 and March 2022 was conducted. The diagnostic accuracy of non-arthrographic MR imaging, direct MR arthrography, and VIBE MRI arthrography in the detection of glenoid bare spot was compared with that of CT arthrography. All studies were reviewed by 2 MSK radiologists. Interobserver agreement for MR imaging and MR arthrographic findings was calculated. Results: Sixteen of 216 patients were excluded. Twenty-three of 200 shoulders had glenoid bare spot on CT arthrographic images. The glenoid bare spot was detected in 11 (47.8%) and 7 (30.4%) patients on conventional non-arthrographic MR images and in 18 (78.3%) and 16 (69.6%) patients on conventional MR arthrograms by observers 1 and 2, respectively. Both observers separately described the bare spot in 22 of 23 patients (95.7%) on 3D volumetric MR arthrograms. Interobserver variabilities were fair agreement for conventional non-arthrographic MR imaging (κ = 0.35, p < 0.05), moderate agreement for conventional MR arthrogram (κ = 0.50, p < 0.05), and near-perfect agreement for 3D volumetric MR arthrogram reading (κ = 0.87, p < 0.05). Conclusions: A 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography sequence may yield diagnostic performance that is comparable with that of CT arthrography in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot. Key Points: •Glenoid bare spot should not be misdiagnosed as a transchondral defect of the glenoid surface by radiologists. •A 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography sequence may be used as a high-sensitivity imaging technique in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12068Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09443-0Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorOzel, Mehmet Ali
dc.contributor.authorOgul, Hayri
dc.contributor.authorKoksal, Ali
dc.contributor.authorKose, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, Kutsi
dc.contributor.authorEren, Suat
dc.contributor.authorKantarci, Mecit
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:27:01.231060508Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:27:01.231060508Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, and 3D T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) MR arthrography sequences as compared with a CT arthrography in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot. Methods: A retrospective study of 216 patients who underwent non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, VIBE MRI arthrography, and CT arthrogram between January 2011 and March 2022 was conducted. The diagnostic accuracy of non-arthrographic MR imaging, direct MR arthrography, and VIBE MRI arthrography in the detection of glenoid bare spot was compared with that of CT arthrography. All studies were reviewed by 2 MSK radiologists. Interobserver agreement for MR imaging and MR arthrographic findings was calculated. Results: Sixteen of 216 patients were excluded. Twenty-three of 200 shoulders had glenoid bare spot on CT arthrographic images. The glenoid bare spot was detected in 11 (47.8%) and 7 (30.4%) patients on conventional non-arthrographic MR images and in 18 (78.3%) and 16 (69.6%) patients on conventional MR arthrograms by observers 1 and 2, respectively. Both observers separately described the bare spot in 22 of 23 patients (95.7%) on 3D volumetric MR arthrograms. Interobserver variabilities were fair agreement for conventional non-arthrographic MR imaging (κ = 0.35, p < 0.05), moderate agreement for conventional MR arthrogram (κ = 0.50, p < 0.05), and near-perfect agreement for 3D volumetric MR arthrogram reading (κ = 0.87, p < 0.05). Conclusions: A 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography sequence may yield diagnostic performance that is comparable with that of CT arthrography in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot. Key Points: •Glenoid bare spot should not be misdiagnosed as a transchondral defect of the glenoid surface by radiologists. •A 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography sequence may be used as a high-sensitivity imaging technique in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-023-09443-0
dc.identifier.eissn1432-1084
dc.identifier.endpage3285
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pmid36792853
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85148108504
dc.identifier.startpage3276
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12068
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000937953400001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Radiology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectArthrography
dc.subjectGlenoid cavity
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectTomography
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectImaging, Three-Dimensional
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectTomography, X-Ray Computed
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectbreath holding
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdiagnosis
dc.subjectdiagnostic accuracy
dc.subjectdiagnostic error
dc.subjectdiagnostic test accuracy study
dc.subjectdiagnostic value
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinterrater reliability
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectnuclear magnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectradiologist
dc.subjectretrospective study
dc.subjectT1 weighted imaging
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectthree-dimensional imaging
dc.subjectx-ray computed tomography
dc.titleDetection of the glenoid bare spot by non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, and 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography: comparison with CT arthrography
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus4
rdl.citation.wos2
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)