Flood Routing Calculation with ANN, SVM, GPR, and RTE Methods

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Flood routing analysis is of great importance in predicting floods and taking all necessary precautions in the area where the flood occurred. By applying different machine learning algorithms to historical flood data, the success of the established models in flood routing calculations has been measured. In this study, flood hydrograph data on 05.05.2014 was passed through the training and testing stages using the Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Regression Tree Ensembles (RTE), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) methods, then routing calculations were made by applying the flood data on 03.06.2015 to these models. The results were compared with either ANN, SVM, GPR, RTE, or measured values. Root Mean Square Errors (RMSE) and Correlation Coefficient (R) values were calculated at the end of the comparative analysis. In conclusion, it has been determined that verifying the flood routing results performed by the SVM is the best result. © 2022, HARD Publishing Company. All rights reserved.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12853Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/151542Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorSarigöl, Metin
dc.contributor.authorYesilyurt, Sefa Nur
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:27:42.932532679Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:27:42.932532679Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractFlood routing analysis is of great importance in predicting floods and taking all necessary precautions in the area where the flood occurred. By applying different machine learning algorithms to historical flood data, the success of the established models in flood routing calculations has been measured. In this study, flood hydrograph data on 05.05.2014 was passed through the training and testing stages using the Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Regression Tree Ensembles (RTE), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) methods, then routing calculations were made by applying the flood data on 03.06.2015 to these models. The results were compared with either ANN, SVM, GPR, RTE, or measured values. Root Mean Square Errors (RMSE) and Correlation Coefficient (R) values were calculated at the end of the comparative analysis. In conclusion, it has been determined that verifying the flood routing results performed by the SVM is the best result. © 2022, HARD Publishing Company. All rights reserved.
dc.description.sponsorship; Seventh Framework Programme, FP7, (308497)
dc.identifier.doi10.15244/pjoes/151542
dc.identifier.endpage5228
dc.identifier.issn1230-1485
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85141087388
dc.identifier.startpage5221
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12853
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherHARD Publishing Company
dc.relation.ispartofPolish Journal of Environmental Studies
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectArtificial Neural Network
dc.subjectflood routing
dc.subjectGaussian Process Reggression
dc.subjectRegression Tree Ensemble
dc.subjectSupport Vector Machine
dc.titleFlood Routing Calculation with ANN, SVM, GPR, and RTE Methods
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus13
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS