The effect of povidone-iodine-enhanced rectal enema on procedure-related infectious complications before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized study
Özet
Background: – To prospectively evaluate the effects of rectal cleansing using a povidone-iodine (PI) and PI enhanced rectal enema on procedure-related infectious complications in patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy. Methods: – Between September 2023 and March 2024, patients scheduled for their first transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy due to elevated prostate-specific antigen levels, suspicious multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging findings, or abnormal digital rectal examination were prospectively randomized into 2 groups (n = 60 each). All patients received standard prophylactic measures, including antibiotic prophylaxis starting 1 day prior to the procedure and rectal mucosal cleansing with PI immediately before biopsy. Both groups additionally underwent rectal enema administration. In the intervention group, a PI enhanced rectal enema was administered by adding PI to the sodium phosphate enema solution, whereas the control group received a sodium phosphate enema alone. Post-procedural complications, including hematuria, hematospermia, rectal bleeding, fever, acute urinary retention, hospitalization, sepsis, and urine and blood culture results, were recorded and compared using chi-square tests. Results: – In total of 120 patients were enrolled. The mean age in both groups was 66.6 years (± 7.20). Hospitalization due to febrile urinary tract infection occurred in 6 patients (10%) in the control group versus 2 patients (3.3%) in the study group. Positive urine cultures were found in 6 patients (10%) in the control group, while no positive cultures were detected in the study group, a statistically significant difference (P = .046). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of hematuria, hematospermia, rectal bleeding or acute urinary retention. Conclusion: – Rectal cleansing with a PI and PI enhanced rectal enema prior to transrectal prostate biopsy significantly reduced the rate of positive urine cultures. Although the reductions in febrile urinary tract infections and sepsis-related hospitalizations were not statistically significant, the overall trend suggests a potential benefit. Given that infectious complications are the most common adverse events associated with transrectal biopsy, this simple and low-cost intervention may improve patient safety. © 2026 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Tam Kayıt
| Alan | Değer | Dil |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Doğan, Mücahit | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aydin, Cemil | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ekici, Musa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Çağlayan, Mustafa Serdar | |
| dc.contributor.author | Öztürk, Muhammet İhsan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Baykam, Mehmet Murat | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-18T20:25:20.504364273Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-18T20:25:20.504364273Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: – To prospectively evaluate the effects of rectal cleansing using a povidone-iodine (PI) and PI enhanced rectal enema on procedure-related infectious complications in patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy. Methods: – Between September 2023 and March 2024, patients scheduled for their first transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy due to elevated prostate-specific antigen levels, suspicious multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging findings, or abnormal digital rectal examination were prospectively randomized into 2 groups (n = 60 each). All patients received standard prophylactic measures, including antibiotic prophylaxis starting 1 day prior to the procedure and rectal mucosal cleansing with PI immediately before biopsy. Both groups additionally underwent rectal enema administration. In the intervention group, a PI enhanced rectal enema was administered by adding PI to the sodium phosphate enema solution, whereas the control group received a sodium phosphate enema alone. Post-procedural complications, including hematuria, hematospermia, rectal bleeding, fever, acute urinary retention, hospitalization, sepsis, and urine and blood culture results, were recorded and compared using chi-square tests. Results: – In total of 120 patients were enrolled. The mean age in both groups was 66.6 years (± 7.20). Hospitalization due to febrile urinary tract infection occurred in 6 patients (10%) in the control group versus 2 patients (3.3%) in the study group. Positive urine cultures were found in 6 patients (10%) in the control group, while no positive cultures were detected in the study group, a statistically significant difference (P = .046). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of hematuria, hematospermia, rectal bleeding or acute urinary retention. Conclusion: – Rectal cleansing with a PI and PI enhanced rectal enema prior to transrectal prostate biopsy significantly reduced the rate of positive urine cultures. Although the reductions in febrile urinary tract infections and sepsis-related hospitalizations were not statistically significant, the overall trend suggests a potential benefit. Given that infectious complications are the most common adverse events associated with transrectal biopsy, this simple and low-cost intervention may improve patient safety. © 2026 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/md.0000000000048830 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1536-5964 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0025-7974 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 20 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 42152336 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105039569426 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | e48830 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10088 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 105 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001768890900047 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Lippincott Williams and Wilkins | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Medicine (United States) | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | enema | |
| dc.subject | infectious complications | |
| dc.subject | povidone-iodine | |
| dc.subject | prostate cancer | |
| dc.subject | rectal cleansing | |
| dc.subject | transrectal prostate biopsy | |
| dc.subject | urinary tract infection | |
| dc.subject | Aged | |
| dc.subject | Anti-Infective Agents, Local | |
| dc.subject | Humans | |
| dc.subject | Image-Guided Biopsy | |
| dc.subject | Male | |
| dc.subject | Middle Aged | |
| dc.subject | Phosphates | |
| dc.subject | Postoperative Complications | |
| dc.subject | Prospective Studies | |
| dc.subject | Prostate | |
| dc.subject | Prostatic Neoplasms | |
| dc.subject | Rectum | |
| dc.subject | Ultrasonography, Interventional | |
| dc.subject | antibiotic agent | |
| dc.subject | cefixime | |
| dc.subject | povidone iodine | |
| dc.subject | prilocaine | |
| dc.subject | prostate specific antigen | |
| dc.subject | sodium dihydrogen phosphate | |
| dc.subject | phosphate | |
| dc.subject | topical antiinfective agent | |
| dc.subject | antibiotic prophylaxis | |
| dc.subject | Article | |
| dc.title | The effect of povidone-iodine-enhanced rectal enema on procedure-related infectious complications before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized study | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| rdl.citation.scopus | 0 | |
| rdl.citation.wos | 0 | |
| rdl.oa.status | gold | |
| rdl.source.index | SCOPUS | |
| rdl.source.index | WOS | |
| rdl.wos.index | Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) |
