The effect of povidone-iodine-enhanced rectal enema on procedure-related infectious complications before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized study

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Background: – To prospectively evaluate the effects of rectal cleansing using a povidone-iodine (PI) and PI enhanced rectal enema on procedure-related infectious complications in patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy. Methods: – Between September 2023 and March 2024, patients scheduled for their first transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy due to elevated prostate-specific antigen levels, suspicious multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging findings, or abnormal digital rectal examination were prospectively randomized into 2 groups (n = 60 each). All patients received standard prophylactic measures, including antibiotic prophylaxis starting 1 day prior to the procedure and rectal mucosal cleansing with PI immediately before biopsy. Both groups additionally underwent rectal enema administration. In the intervention group, a PI enhanced rectal enema was administered by adding PI to the sodium phosphate enema solution, whereas the control group received a sodium phosphate enema alone. Post-procedural complications, including hematuria, hematospermia, rectal bleeding, fever, acute urinary retention, hospitalization, sepsis, and urine and blood culture results, were recorded and compared using chi-square tests. Results: – In total of 120 patients were enrolled. The mean age in both groups was 66.6 years (± 7.20). Hospitalization due to febrile urinary tract infection occurred in 6 patients (10%) in the control group versus 2 patients (3.3%) in the study group. Positive urine cultures were found in 6 patients (10%) in the control group, while no positive cultures were detected in the study group, a statistically significant difference (P = .046). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of hematuria, hematospermia, rectal bleeding or acute urinary retention. Conclusion: – Rectal cleansing with a PI and PI enhanced rectal enema prior to transrectal prostate biopsy significantly reduced the rate of positive urine cultures. Although the reductions in febrile urinary tract infections and sepsis-related hospitalizations were not statistically significant, the overall trend suggests a potential benefit. Given that infectious complications are the most common adverse events associated with transrectal biopsy, this simple and low-cost intervention may improve patient safety. © 2026 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10088Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000048830Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorDoğan, Mücahit
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Cemil
dc.contributor.authorEkici, Musa
dc.contributor.authorÇağlayan, Mustafa Serdar
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Muhammet İhsan
dc.contributor.authorBaykam, Mehmet Murat
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:25:20.504364273Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:25:20.504364273Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackground: – To prospectively evaluate the effects of rectal cleansing using a povidone-iodine (PI) and PI enhanced rectal enema on procedure-related infectious complications in patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy. Methods: – Between September 2023 and March 2024, patients scheduled for their first transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy due to elevated prostate-specific antigen levels, suspicious multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging findings, or abnormal digital rectal examination were prospectively randomized into 2 groups (n = 60 each). All patients received standard prophylactic measures, including antibiotic prophylaxis starting 1 day prior to the procedure and rectal mucosal cleansing with PI immediately before biopsy. Both groups additionally underwent rectal enema administration. In the intervention group, a PI enhanced rectal enema was administered by adding PI to the sodium phosphate enema solution, whereas the control group received a sodium phosphate enema alone. Post-procedural complications, including hematuria, hematospermia, rectal bleeding, fever, acute urinary retention, hospitalization, sepsis, and urine and blood culture results, were recorded and compared using chi-square tests. Results: – In total of 120 patients were enrolled. The mean age in both groups was 66.6 years (± 7.20). Hospitalization due to febrile urinary tract infection occurred in 6 patients (10%) in the control group versus 2 patients (3.3%) in the study group. Positive urine cultures were found in 6 patients (10%) in the control group, while no positive cultures were detected in the study group, a statistically significant difference (P = .046). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of hematuria, hematospermia, rectal bleeding or acute urinary retention. Conclusion: – Rectal cleansing with a PI and PI enhanced rectal enema prior to transrectal prostate biopsy significantly reduced the rate of positive urine cultures. Although the reductions in febrile urinary tract infections and sepsis-related hospitalizations were not statistically significant, the overall trend suggests a potential benefit. Given that infectious complications are the most common adverse events associated with transrectal biopsy, this simple and low-cost intervention may improve patient safety. © 2026 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/md.0000000000048830
dc.identifier.eissn1536-5964
dc.identifier.issn0025-7974
dc.identifier.issue20
dc.identifier.pmid42152336
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105039569426
dc.identifier.startpagee48830
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10088
dc.identifier.volume105
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001768890900047
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofMedicine (United States)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectenema
dc.subjectinfectious complications
dc.subjectpovidone-iodine
dc.subjectprostate cancer
dc.subjectrectal cleansing
dc.subjecttransrectal prostate biopsy
dc.subjecturinary tract infection
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAnti-Infective Agents, Local
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectImage-Guided Biopsy
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPhosphates
dc.subjectPostoperative Complications
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectProstate
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasms
dc.subjectRectum
dc.subjectUltrasonography, Interventional
dc.subjectantibiotic agent
dc.subjectcefixime
dc.subjectpovidone iodine
dc.subjectprilocaine
dc.subjectprostate specific antigen
dc.subjectsodium dihydrogen phosphate
dc.subjectphosphate
dc.subjecttopical antiinfective agent
dc.subjectantibiotic prophylaxis
dc.subjectArticle
dc.titleThe effect of povidone-iodine-enhanced rectal enema on procedure-related infectious complications before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)