Developing sediment concentration prediction in the Euphrates River catchment, Türkiye, with a honey badger and coati optimization-based hybrid algorithm

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Estimation of sediment concentration (SC) is of vital importance in terms of siltation and economic life of dams, lakes and aqueducts, reservoir operations, design of water resource structures, monitoring and control of water pollution, and flood management. Direct measurement of SC is a challenging and expensive task. For these reasons, it was used to estimate the SC values at a station in the Euphrates River. New hybrid models were established by combining the CatBoost regressor (CBR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models with the honey badger optimization algorithm (HBA) and coati optimization algorithm (COA). The performance of the new model was compared with stand-alone model of ANN and CBR, and their accuracy was evaluated. In the setup of the models, 4 different input combinations of lagged sediment and discharge values for up to 3 months were evaluated. It is noteworthy that as the number of input variables, i.e., lagged data input, increases, the prediction accuracy of the models generally increases. HBA and COA algorithms often improve the accuracy of sediment prediction by optimizing the parameters of the single machine learning model. In addition, according to the AIC performance metric, the HBA algorithm is generally slightly better capable of optimization than the COA. The best model outputs were obtained according to the HBA-CBR hybrid approach of scenario 4 (RMSE = 59.78, AIC = 785.03, R2 = 0.32, PBIAS = 0.016, SI = 0.48, and MBE = − 2.05 in test phase), which consists of discharge and sediment with a delay of up to 3 months. The results of the study are valuable for decision-makers and planners in terms of practical reservoir and flood management and protection of coasts and river beds. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11009Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14230-zYayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorSaroughi, Mohsen
dc.contributor.authorKatipoğlu, Okan Mert
dc.contributor.authorKartal, Veysi
dc.contributor.authorSimsek, Oguz
dc.contributor.authorKilinc, Huseyin Cagan
dc.contributor.authorPande, Chaitanya Baliram
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:26:06.976198491Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:26:06.976198491Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractEstimation of sediment concentration (SC) is of vital importance in terms of siltation and economic life of dams, lakes and aqueducts, reservoir operations, design of water resource structures, monitoring and control of water pollution, and flood management. Direct measurement of SC is a challenging and expensive task. For these reasons, it was used to estimate the SC values at a station in the Euphrates River. New hybrid models were established by combining the CatBoost regressor (CBR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models with the honey badger optimization algorithm (HBA) and coati optimization algorithm (COA). The performance of the new model was compared with stand-alone model of ANN and CBR, and their accuracy was evaluated. In the setup of the models, 4 different input combinations of lagged sediment and discharge values for up to 3 months were evaluated. It is noteworthy that as the number of input variables, i.e., lagged data input, increases, the prediction accuracy of the models generally increases. HBA and COA algorithms often improve the accuracy of sediment prediction by optimizing the parameters of the single machine learning model. In addition, according to the AIC performance metric, the HBA algorithm is generally slightly better capable of optimization than the COA. The best model outputs were obtained according to the HBA-CBR hybrid approach of scenario 4 (RMSE = 59.78, AIC = 785.03, R2 = 0.32, PBIAS = 0.016, SI = 0.48, and MBE = − 2.05 in test phase), which consists of discharge and sediment with a delay of up to 3 months. The results of the study are valuable for decision-makers and planners in terms of practical reservoir and flood management and protection of coasts and river beds. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10661-025-14230-z
dc.identifier.eissn1573-2959
dc.identifier.issn0167-6369
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.pmid40563057
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105009340317
dc.identifier.startpage806
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11009
dc.identifier.volume197
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001517116300002
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectEuphrates River
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.subjectMetaheuristic optimization
dc.subjectPrediction
dc.subjectSediment
dc.subjectAlgorithms
dc.subjectEnvironmental Monitoring
dc.subjectGeologic Sediments
dc.subjectNeural Networks, Computer
dc.subjectRivers
dc.subjectTurkey
dc.subjectWater Pollutants, Chemical
dc.subjectCatchments
dc.subjectDecision making
dc.subjectFlood control
dc.subjectFloods
dc.subjectFood products
dc.subjectLearning algorithms
dc.subjectLearning systems
dc.subjectReservoir management
dc.subjectReservoirs (water)
dc.subjectRiver control
dc.subjectRiver pollution
dc.subjectSedimentation
dc.subjectSediments
dc.subjectConcentration prediction
dc.subjectFlood management
dc.subjectHybrid algorithms
dc.subjectMachine-learning
dc.subjectOptimisations
dc.titleDeveloping sediment concentration prediction in the Euphrates River catchment, Türkiye, with a honey badger and coati optimization-based hybrid algorithm
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus3
rdl.citation.wos3
rdl.departmentDepartment of Civil Engineering, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Türkiye. okatipoglu@erzincan.edu.tr.
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)