Assessing Femoral Head Medialization in Developmental Hip Dysplasia Type 1 and Type 2 Hip Separation

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Background/Objectives: The prevalence of developmental hip dysplasia is estimated to be 0.1–2 per 1000 infants. Hip imaging by ultrasonography is considered to be the gold standard method for screening and detecting developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), as per the Graf categorization. The classification of hip differentiation into type 1 and type 2 is determined by the alpha angle, as assessed by the Graf classification. Type 1 hips are defined as those with an alpha angle exceeding 60 degrees, whilst type 2 hips are defined as those with measurements falling within the range of 50 to 59 degrees. Methods: The computerized patient card in our institution had a compilation of 208 hip photographs taken from 110 patients, with 98 of them being bilateral. The acquisition of these photos occurred from January 2020 to December 2020. A retrospective review was conducted on the ultrasound (US) scans, with a specific emphasis on the outcomes related to type 1 and type 2 hips. Results: There were 108 high-resolution US photos in the type 1 hip group and 100 high-resolution US images in the type 2 hip group. In terms of unilateral or bilateral cases, gender, or age, no statistically significant differences were seen between the two groups (p > 0.05). The FMD model exhibited a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 70% in effectively predicting the presence of type 1 mature hips when the values surpassed 2.9 mm. The AUC (area under the curve) value achieved was 0.628. Conclusions: The process of diagnostic categorization may occasionally encounter challenges in accurately differentiating between type 1 and type 2 hip separation subsequent to a hip ultrasound examination. The findings of our analysis indicate that the assessment of the FMD is a highly successful method, demonstrating both high specificity and sensitivity in differentiating between various scenarios. © 2024 by the authors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11119Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14202317Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Sonay
dc.contributor.authorDurmaz, Onder
dc.contributor.authorFatihoglu, Erdem
dc.contributor.authorKadirhan, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorKaravas, Erdal
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:26:13.191212025Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:26:13.191212025Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objectives: The prevalence of developmental hip dysplasia is estimated to be 0.1–2 per 1000 infants. Hip imaging by ultrasonography is considered to be the gold standard method for screening and detecting developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), as per the Graf categorization. The classification of hip differentiation into type 1 and type 2 is determined by the alpha angle, as assessed by the Graf classification. Type 1 hips are defined as those with an alpha angle exceeding 60 degrees, whilst type 2 hips are defined as those with measurements falling within the range of 50 to 59 degrees. Methods: The computerized patient card in our institution had a compilation of 208 hip photographs taken from 110 patients, with 98 of them being bilateral. The acquisition of these photos occurred from January 2020 to December 2020. A retrospective review was conducted on the ultrasound (US) scans, with a specific emphasis on the outcomes related to type 1 and type 2 hips. Results: There were 108 high-resolution US photos in the type 1 hip group and 100 high-resolution US images in the type 2 hip group. In terms of unilateral or bilateral cases, gender, or age, no statistically significant differences were seen between the two groups (p > 0.05). The FMD model exhibited a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 70% in effectively predicting the presence of type 1 mature hips when the values surpassed 2.9 mm. The AUC (area under the curve) value achieved was 0.628. Conclusions: The process of diagnostic categorization may occasionally encounter challenges in accurately differentiating between type 1 and type 2 hip separation subsequent to a hip ultrasound examination. The findings of our analysis indicate that the assessment of the FMD is a highly successful method, demonstrating both high specificity and sensitivity in differentiating between various scenarios. © 2024 by the authors.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/diagnostics14202317
dc.identifier.eissn2075-4418
dc.identifier.issn2075-4418
dc.identifier.issue20
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC11506930
dc.identifier.pmid39451640
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85207513147
dc.identifier.startpage2317
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11119
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001342584200001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.relation.ispartofDiagnostics
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectdevelopmental dysplasia
dc.subjectfemur
dc.subjectGraf classification
dc.subjecthip
dc.subjectmeasurement
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectarea under the curve
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectbreech presentation
dc.subjectchild
dc.subjectdisease classification
dc.subjectechography
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfemoral head
dc.subjecthip dysplasia
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinfant
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmetaphysis
dc.subjectretrospective study
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificity
dc.subjectultrasound
dc.titleAssessing Femoral Head Medialization in Developmental Hip Dysplasia Type 1 and Type 2 Hip Separation
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.departmentDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan University, 24100 Erzincan, Turkey.
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)