A comparative study of daily streamflow forecasting using firefly, artificial bee colony, and genetic algorithm-based artificial neural network
Özet
The management of water resources and the modeling of river flow have a prominent position within environmental research. They form a critical bridge between human societies and the delicate ecosystems they inhabit. Scholars have focused on benefiting more efficient methods based on the use of artificial intelligence for river flow forecasting, notably because modeling hydrological systems is quite challenging. This study primarily centered on exploring the predictive capacities of hybrid models in establishing a link between daily flow data and prospective data. In the study, the mentioned algorithms, firefly algorithm (FFA), artificial bee colony (ABC), genetic algorithm (GA), were hybridized with the artificial neural network (ANN) model and data analyzes were examined with the stations in the Konya Closed Basin. A comparative analysis of FFA–ANN, GA–ANN, ABC–ANN, and long short-term memory (LSTM) models was conducted for daily flow forecasting for daily flow forecasting according to a range of graphical and statistical metrics. The outcomes indicate that the FFA–ANN hybrid model generally performed better than other models and the deep learning algorithm. © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences 2024.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Tam Kayıt
| Alan | Değer | Dil |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Kilinc, Huseyin Cagan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Haznedar, Bulent | |
| dc.contributor.author | Katipoğlu, Okan Mert | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ozkan, Furkan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-18T20:26:32.758438638Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-18T20:26:32.758438638Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The management of water resources and the modeling of river flow have a prominent position within environmental research. They form a critical bridge between human societies and the delicate ecosystems they inhabit. Scholars have focused on benefiting more efficient methods based on the use of artificial intelligence for river flow forecasting, notably because modeling hydrological systems is quite challenging. This study primarily centered on exploring the predictive capacities of hybrid models in establishing a link between daily flow data and prospective data. In the study, the mentioned algorithms, firefly algorithm (FFA), artificial bee colony (ABC), genetic algorithm (GA), were hybridized with the artificial neural network (ANN) model and data analyzes were examined with the stations in the Konya Closed Basin. A comparative analysis of FFA–ANN, GA–ANN, ABC–ANN, and long short-term memory (LSTM) models was conducted for daily flow forecasting for daily flow forecasting according to a range of graphical and statistical metrics. The outcomes indicate that the FFA–ANN hybrid model generally performed better than other models and the deep learning algorithm. © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences 2024. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | The author is immensely grateful to the General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works for their support and cooperation in sharing the required data. We would like to extend our sincere thanks to both the Editor and the anonymous reviewers for their invaluable contributions to the content and development of this paper. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11600-024-01362-y | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1895-7455 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 4595 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1895-6572 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 6 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85193368669 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 4575 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11503 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 72 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001223480100002 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Acta Geophysica | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | Artificial bee colony algorithm | |
| dc.subject | Deep learning | |
| dc.subject | Firefly algorithm | |
| dc.subject | Forecasting | |
| dc.subject | Streamflow | |
| dc.subject | Konya Basin | |
| dc.subject | Konya [Turkey] | |
| dc.subject | Turkey | |
| dc.subject | Bioluminescence | |
| dc.subject | Genetic algorithms | |
| dc.subject | Learning algorithms | |
| dc.subject | Long short-term memory | |
| dc.subject | Stream flow | |
| dc.subject | Water management | |
| dc.subject | Artificial bees | |
| dc.subject | Bee colony algorithms | |
| dc.subject | Comparatives studies | |
| dc.subject | Firefly algorithms | |
| dc.subject | Flow forecasting | |
| dc.subject | Hybrid model | |
| dc.subject | Streamflow forecasting | |
| dc.subject | artificial neural network | |
| dc.subject | comparative study | |
| dc.subject | forecasting method | |
| dc.subject | genetic algorithm | |
| dc.subject | machine learning | |
| dc.subject | river flow | |
| dc.title | A comparative study of daily streamflow forecasting using firefly, artificial bee colony, and genetic algorithm-based artificial neural network | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| rdl.citation.scopus | 6 | |
| rdl.citation.wos | 4 | |
| rdl.source.index | SCOPUS | |
| rdl.source.index | WOS | |
| rdl.wos.index | Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) |
