Hybrid machine learning models for groundwater level prediction in a snow-dominated region: An evaluation of EEMD, VMD and EWT decomposition techniques

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Water scarcity is a pressing issue, intensified by factors such as population growth and industrialization. Hence, it is crucial to monitor, conserve and analyse groundwater resources, which are essential sources of clean and usable water. This study examines changes in groundwater levels (GWLs) in northeastern Turkey's mountainous and snow-covered area. The primary objective is to assess the effectiveness of integrated machine learning models, specifically, the extreme learning machine (ELM) technique combined with signal decomposition techniques such as ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), variational mode decomposition (VMD) and empirical wavelet transform (EWT) for monthly GWL prediction models. Seventy percent of the accessible data is allocated for training, while 30% is designated for testing. A correlation matrix involving precipitation, temperature, relative humidity and GWL parameters is generated with inputs that possess significant correlations being selected, such as GWLt−1, GWLt−2, RHt, RHt−1 and RHt−2. To evaluate model results, various metrics, including mean squared error, mean absolute error, mean absolute percentage error, mean bias error, bias factor, determination coefficient, Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency, as well as tools such as box plots, Taylor diagrams and radar charts, are utilized to compare outcomes during the interpretation phase. The results of the analyses show that applying data decomposition methods such as EEMD, VMD and EWT significantly improves the performance of the ELM algorithm in predicting GWLs. VMD-ELM is the most accurate for GWL forecasting among the approaches examined. The R2 values of the most successful models established in the two wells are 0.993 and 0.905. The outcomes of this research hold significance for decision-makers and policymakers as it offers informative insights into aquifer surveillance, irrigation strategizing and efficient administration of water resources. © 2024 The Authors. Hydrological Processes published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11940Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15169Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorGezici, Kadir
dc.contributor.authorKatipoğlu, Okan Mert
dc.contributor.authorŞengül, Selim
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:26:54.976147321Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:26:54.976147321Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractWater scarcity is a pressing issue, intensified by factors such as population growth and industrialization. Hence, it is crucial to monitor, conserve and analyse groundwater resources, which are essential sources of clean and usable water. This study examines changes in groundwater levels (GWLs) in northeastern Turkey's mountainous and snow-covered area. The primary objective is to assess the effectiveness of integrated machine learning models, specifically, the extreme learning machine (ELM) technique combined with signal decomposition techniques such as ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), variational mode decomposition (VMD) and empirical wavelet transform (EWT) for monthly GWL prediction models. Seventy percent of the accessible data is allocated for training, while 30% is designated for testing. A correlation matrix involving precipitation, temperature, relative humidity and GWL parameters is generated with inputs that possess significant correlations being selected, such as GWLt−1, GWLt−2, RHt, RHt−1 and RHt−2. To evaluate model results, various metrics, including mean squared error, mean absolute error, mean absolute percentage error, mean bias error, bias factor, determination coefficient, Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency, as well as tools such as box plots, Taylor diagrams and radar charts, are utilized to compare outcomes during the interpretation phase. The results of the analyses show that applying data decomposition methods such as EEMD, VMD and EWT significantly improves the performance of the ELM algorithm in predicting GWLs. VMD-ELM is the most accurate for GWL forecasting among the approaches examined. The R2 values of the most successful models established in the two wells are 0.993 and 0.905. The outcomes of this research hold significance for decision-makers and policymakers as it offers informative insights into aquifer surveillance, irrigation strategizing and efficient administration of water resources. © 2024 The Authors. Hydrological Processes published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hyp.15169
dc.identifier.eissn1099-1085
dc.identifier.issn0885-6087
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85193550063
dc.identifier.startpagee15169
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11940
dc.identifier.volume38
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001226512800001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofHydrological Processes
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectempirical wavelet transform
dc.subjectextreme learning machine
dc.subjectgroundwater level
dc.subjectmachine learning
dc.subjectsignal decomposition
dc.subjectvariational mode decomposition
dc.subjectTurkey
dc.subjectAquifers
dc.subjectDecision making
dc.subjectEmpirical mode decomposition
dc.subjectErrors
dc.subjectForecasting
dc.subjectGroundwater resources
dc.subjectKnowledge acquisition
dc.subjectMean square error
dc.subjectPopulation statistics
dc.subjectSnow
dc.subjectWavelet decomposition
dc.subjectGround water level
dc.subjectHybrid machine learning
dc.subjectLearning machines
dc.subjectMachine learning models
dc.subjectMachine-learning
dc.subjectWavelets transform
dc.subjectcomputer simulation
dc.subjectdecomposition analysis
dc.subjecterror analysis
dc.subjectgroundwater
dc.subjectgroundwater resource
dc.subjectindustrialization
dc.titleHybrid machine learning models for groundwater level prediction in a snow-dominated region: An evaluation of EEMD, VMD and EWT decomposition techniques
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus20
rdl.citation.wos21
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)