Detection of the glenoid bare spot by non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, and 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography: comparison with CT arthrography
Özet
Objectives: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, and 3D T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) MR arthrography sequences as compared with a CT arthrography in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot. Methods: A retrospective study of 216 patients who underwent non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, VIBE MRI arthrography, and CT arthrogram between January 2011 and March 2022 was conducted. The diagnostic accuracy of non-arthrographic MR imaging, direct MR arthrography, and VIBE MRI arthrography in the detection of glenoid bare spot was compared with that of CT arthrography. All studies were reviewed by 2 MSK radiologists. Interobserver agreement for MR imaging and MR arthrographic findings was calculated. Results: Sixteen of 216 patients were excluded. Twenty-three of 200 shoulders had glenoid bare spot on CT arthrographic images. The glenoid bare spot was detected in 11 (47.8%) and 7 (30.4%) patients on conventional non-arthrographic MR images and in 18 (78.3%) and 16 (69.6%) patients on conventional MR arthrograms by observers 1 and 2, respectively. Both observers separately described the bare spot in 22 of 23 patients (95.7%) on 3D volumetric MR arthrograms. Interobserver variabilities were fair agreement for conventional non-arthrographic MR imaging (κ = 0.35, p < 0.05), moderate agreement for conventional MR arthrogram (κ = 0.50, p < 0.05), and near-perfect agreement for 3D volumetric MR arthrogram reading (κ = 0.87, p < 0.05). Conclusions: A 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography sequence may yield diagnostic performance that is comparable with that of CT arthrography in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot. Key Points: •Glenoid bare spot should not be misdiagnosed as a transchondral defect of the glenoid surface by radiologists. •A 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography sequence may be used as a high-sensitivity imaging technique in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Tam Kayıt
| Alan | Değer | Dil |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Ozel, Mehmet Ali | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ogul, Hayri | |
| dc.contributor.author | Koksal, Ali | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kose, Mehmet | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tuncer, Kutsi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Eren, Suat | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kantarci, Mecit | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-18T20:27:01.231060508Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-18T20:27:01.231060508Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, and 3D T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) MR arthrography sequences as compared with a CT arthrography in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot. Methods: A retrospective study of 216 patients who underwent non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, VIBE MRI arthrography, and CT arthrogram between January 2011 and March 2022 was conducted. The diagnostic accuracy of non-arthrographic MR imaging, direct MR arthrography, and VIBE MRI arthrography in the detection of glenoid bare spot was compared with that of CT arthrography. All studies were reviewed by 2 MSK radiologists. Interobserver agreement for MR imaging and MR arthrographic findings was calculated. Results: Sixteen of 216 patients were excluded. Twenty-three of 200 shoulders had glenoid bare spot on CT arthrographic images. The glenoid bare spot was detected in 11 (47.8%) and 7 (30.4%) patients on conventional non-arthrographic MR images and in 18 (78.3%) and 16 (69.6%) patients on conventional MR arthrograms by observers 1 and 2, respectively. Both observers separately described the bare spot in 22 of 23 patients (95.7%) on 3D volumetric MR arthrograms. Interobserver variabilities were fair agreement for conventional non-arthrographic MR imaging (κ = 0.35, p < 0.05), moderate agreement for conventional MR arthrogram (κ = 0.50, p < 0.05), and near-perfect agreement for 3D volumetric MR arthrogram reading (κ = 0.87, p < 0.05). Conclusions: A 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography sequence may yield diagnostic performance that is comparable with that of CT arthrography in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot. Key Points: •Glenoid bare spot should not be misdiagnosed as a transchondral defect of the glenoid surface by radiologists. •A 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography sequence may be used as a high-sensitivity imaging technique in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00330-023-09443-0 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1432-1084 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 3285 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0938-7994 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 5 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 36792853 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85148108504 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 3276 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12068 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 33 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000937953400001 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | European Radiology | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | Arthrography | |
| dc.subject | Glenoid cavity | |
| dc.subject | Magnetic resonance imaging | |
| dc.subject | Tomography | |
| dc.subject | Humans | |
| dc.subject | Imaging, Three-Dimensional | |
| dc.subject | Retrospective Studies | |
| dc.subject | Tomography, X-Ray Computed | |
| dc.subject | adult | |
| dc.subject | article | |
| dc.subject | breath holding | |
| dc.subject | controlled study | |
| dc.subject | diagnosis | |
| dc.subject | diagnostic accuracy | |
| dc.subject | diagnostic error | |
| dc.subject | diagnostic test accuracy study | |
| dc.subject | diagnostic value | |
| dc.subject | female | |
| dc.subject | human | |
| dc.subject | interrater reliability | |
| dc.subject | major clinical study | |
| dc.subject | male | |
| dc.subject | nuclear magnetic resonance imaging | |
| dc.subject | radiologist | |
| dc.subject | retrospective study | |
| dc.subject | T1 weighted imaging | |
| dc.subject | procedures | |
| dc.subject | three-dimensional imaging | |
| dc.subject | x-ray computed tomography | |
| dc.title | Detection of the glenoid bare spot by non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, and 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography: comparison with CT arthrography | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| rdl.citation.scopus | 4 | |
| rdl.citation.wos | 2 | |
| rdl.oa.status | green | |
| rdl.source.index | SCOPUS | |
| rdl.source.index | WOS | |
| rdl.wos.index | Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) |
