Textbook outcome following oesophagectomy for cancer: international cohort study

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Background: Textbook outcome has been proposed as a tool for the assessment of oncological surgical care. However, an international assessment in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer has not been reported. This study aimed to assess textbook outcome in an international setting. Methods: Patients undergoing curative resection for oesophageal cancer were identified from the international Oesophagogastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) from April 2018 to December 2018. Textbook outcome was defined as the percentage of patients who underwent a complete tumour resection with at least 15 lymph nodes in the resected specimen and an uneventful postoperative course, without hospital readmission. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify factors independently associated with textbook outcome, and results are presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (95 per cent c.i.). Results: Of 2159 patients with oesophageal cancer, 39.7 per cent achieved a textbook outcome. The outcome parameter 'no major postoperative complication' had the greatest negative impact on a textbook outcome for patients with oesophageal cancer, compared to other textbook outcome parameters. Multivariable analysis identified male gender and increasing Charlson comorbidity index with a significantly lower likelihood of textbook outcome. Presence of 24-hour on-call rota for oesophageal surgeons (OR 2.05, 95 per cent c.i. 1.30 to 3.22; P = 0.002) and radiology (OR 1.54, 95 per cent c.i. 1.05 to 2.24; P = 0.027), total minimally invasive oesophagectomies (OR 1.63, 95 per cent c.i. 1.27 to 2.08; P < 0.001), and chest anastomosis above azygous (OR 2.17, 95 per cent c.i. 1.58 to 2.98; P < 0.001) were independently associated with a significantly increased likelihood of textbook outcome. Conclusion: Textbook outcome is achieved in less than 40 per cent of patients having oesophagectomy for cancer. Improvements in centralization, hospital resources, access to minimal access surgery, and adoption of newer techniques for improving lymph node yield could improve textbook outcome. © 2022 The Author(s).

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12545Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac016Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKamarajah, S.K.
dc.contributor.authorNepogodiev, D.
dc.contributor.authorHodson, J.
dc.contributor.authorBundred, J.R.
dc.contributor.authorGockel, I.
dc.contributor.authorIsik, A.
dc.contributor.authorKidane, B.
dc.contributor.authorMahendran, H.A.
dc.contributor.authorNegoi, I.
dc.contributor.authorWijnhoven, B.P.L.
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, Ewen A.
dc.contributor.authorAlderson, D.
dc.contributor.authorJefferies, B.
dc.contributor.authorSiaw-Acheampong, K.
dc.contributor.authorWanigasooriya, K.
dc.contributor.authorWhitehouse, T.
dc.contributor.authorGjata, A.
dc.contributor.authorMoreno, J.I.
dc.contributor.authorTakeda, F.R.
dc.contributor.authorCastro, R. Guevara
dc.contributor.authorHarustiak, T.
dc.contributor.authorBekele, A.
dc.contributor.authorKechagias, A.
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, A.
dc.contributor.authorDa Roit, A.
dc.contributor.authorBagajevas, A.
dc.contributor.authorAzagra, J.S.
dc.contributor.authorMejía-Fernández, L.
dc.contributor.authorEl Kafsi, J.
dc.contributor.authorSayyed, R.H.
dc.contributor.authorSousa, M.
dc.contributor.authorSampaio, A.S.
dc.contributor.authorBlanco, R.
dc.contributor.authorWallner, B.
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, P.M.
dc.contributor.authorHsu, P.K.
dc.contributor.authorEgberts, J.H.
dc.contributor.authorMigliore, M.
dc.contributor.authorValmasoni, M.
dc.contributor.authorMedina-Franco, H.
dc.contributor.authorLau, P.C.
dc.contributor.authorOkonta, K.E.
dc.contributor.authorHeisterkamp, J.
dc.contributor.authorGordon, A.
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, J.
dc.contributor.authorColak, E.
dc.contributor.authorCheong, E.
dc.contributor.authorMaynard, N.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Bahrani, A.
dc.contributor.authorGananadha, S.
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:27:26.349563245Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:27:26.349563245Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBackground: Textbook outcome has been proposed as a tool for the assessment of oncological surgical care. However, an international assessment in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer has not been reported. This study aimed to assess textbook outcome in an international setting. Methods: Patients undergoing curative resection for oesophageal cancer were identified from the international Oesophagogastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) from April 2018 to December 2018. Textbook outcome was defined as the percentage of patients who underwent a complete tumour resection with at least 15 lymph nodes in the resected specimen and an uneventful postoperative course, without hospital readmission. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify factors independently associated with textbook outcome, and results are presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (95 per cent c.i.). Results: Of 2159 patients with oesophageal cancer, 39.7 per cent achieved a textbook outcome. The outcome parameter 'no major postoperative complication' had the greatest negative impact on a textbook outcome for patients with oesophageal cancer, compared to other textbook outcome parameters. Multivariable analysis identified male gender and increasing Charlson comorbidity index with a significantly lower likelihood of textbook outcome. Presence of 24-hour on-call rota for oesophageal surgeons (OR 2.05, 95 per cent c.i. 1.30 to 3.22; P = 0.002) and radiology (OR 1.54, 95 per cent c.i. 1.05 to 2.24; P = 0.027), total minimally invasive oesophagectomies (OR 1.63, 95 per cent c.i. 1.27 to 2.08; P < 0.001), and chest anastomosis above azygous (OR 2.17, 95 per cent c.i. 1.58 to 2.98; P < 0.001) were independently associated with a significantly increased likelihood of textbook outcome. Conclusion: Textbook outcome is achieved in less than 40 per cent of patients having oesophagectomy for cancer. Improvements in centralization, hospital resources, access to minimal access surgery, and adoption of newer techniques for improving lymph node yield could improve textbook outcome. © 2022 The Author(s).
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bjs/znac016
dc.identifier.endpage449
dc.identifier.issn0007-1323
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pmid35194634
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85128800428
dc.identifier.startpage439
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12545
dc.identifier.volume109
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Surgery
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAnastomosis, Surgical
dc.subjectCohort Studies
dc.subjectEsophageal Neoplasms
dc.subjectEsophagectomy
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMinimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectanastomosis
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcancer chemotherapy
dc.subjectcancer grading
dc.subjectcancer surgery
dc.subjectCharlson Comorbidity Index
dc.subjectchemoradiotherapy
dc.subjectclinical outcome
dc.subjectcohort analysis
dc.subjectenteric feeding
dc.subjectesophagus cancer
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthigh income country
dc.subjecthospital readmission
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectlength of stay
dc.subjectlow income country
dc.subjectlymph node
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmiddle income country
dc.subjectminimally invasive esophagectomy
dc.titleTextbook outcome following oesophagectomy for cancer: international cohort study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus44
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS