Comparison of Carbapenem Resistance Detected by the BD Phoenix Automated System in Enterobacteriaceae Isolates with E-Test Method

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Objective: Automatic identification and antimicrobial susceptibility systems are frequently used to identify clinical isolates in hospitalized patients, but mistakes in these systems can lead to potentially devastating treatment failures for patients. Therefore, the ‘‘Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)’’ recommends confirming all Carbapenem-resistant and low-susceptibility isolates with a different method. The aim of this study is to compare the Carbapenem susceptibility results of isolates reported as Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae according to the BD Phoenix 100 automated system with the E-test method. Materials and Methods: The study included 70 strains of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae members which were isolated and grown from several types of clinical samples in the Medical Microbiology Laboratory. Conventional methods (Gram stain, negative oxidase test) and the BD Phoenix 100 automated system were used to identify the isolates. The susceptibility of all strains to imipenem, ertapenem and meropenem was investigated by E-test method. Automated system results and E-test results were compared. Results: The frequency distribution of all isolated bacterial strains comprised K. pneumoniae in 56 (80%) of the samples included in the study. The automated system test results were correlated with the results of the E-test at a rate of 96.1 % for the imipenem-resistant strains, 84.3% for the meropenem-resistant strains, 84.1% for the ertapenem-resistant strains Conclusions: Automated systems are frequently used in microbiology laboratories to identify isolates. However, automated systems can show a high error rate against some antimicrobials. For this reason, comparing the results of automated system test results with tests such as E-test is very important to prevent both treatment failures and inappropriate antibiotic use that may occur on a patient basis. © 2022 by Author/s and Licensed by Modestum.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12649Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/11672Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorSunnetcioglu, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorGuducuoglu, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorAkyuz, Sumeyye
dc.contributor.authorBaran, Ali Irfan
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:27:31.639044328Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:27:31.639044328Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractObjective: Automatic identification and antimicrobial susceptibility systems are frequently used to identify clinical isolates in hospitalized patients, but mistakes in these systems can lead to potentially devastating treatment failures for patients. Therefore, the ‘‘Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)’’ recommends confirming all Carbapenem-resistant and low-susceptibility isolates with a different method. The aim of this study is to compare the Carbapenem susceptibility results of isolates reported as Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae according to the BD Phoenix 100 automated system with the E-test method. Materials and Methods: The study included 70 strains of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae members which were isolated and grown from several types of clinical samples in the Medical Microbiology Laboratory. Conventional methods (Gram stain, negative oxidase test) and the BD Phoenix 100 automated system were used to identify the isolates. The susceptibility of all strains to imipenem, ertapenem and meropenem was investigated by E-test method. Automated system results and E-test results were compared. Results: The frequency distribution of all isolated bacterial strains comprised K. pneumoniae in 56 (80%) of the samples included in the study. The automated system test results were correlated with the results of the E-test at a rate of 96.1 % for the imipenem-resistant strains, 84.3% for the meropenem-resistant strains, 84.1% for the ertapenem-resistant strains Conclusions: Automated systems are frequently used in microbiology laboratories to identify isolates. However, automated systems can show a high error rate against some antimicrobials. For this reason, comparing the results of automated system test results with tests such as E-test is very important to prevent both treatment failures and inappropriate antibiotic use that may occur on a patient basis. © 2022 by Author/s and Licensed by Modestum.
dc.description.sponsorshipAuthor contributions: All authors have sufficiently contributed to the study, and agreed with the results and conclusions. Funding: This work was supported by the Yuzuncu Yil University Research Fund as project number 93VF-219. Declaration of interest: No conflict of interest is declared by authors.
dc.identifier.doi10.29333/ejgm/11672
dc.identifier.issn2516-3507
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85128309200
dc.identifier.startpageem362
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12649
dc.identifier.volume19
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherModestum LTD
dc.relation.ispartofElectronic Journal of General Medicine
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCarbapenemase
dc.subjecte-test
dc.subjectEnterobacteriaceae
dc.subjectcarbapenem
dc.subjectertapenem
dc.subjectimipenem
dc.subjectmeropenem
dc.subjectabscess
dc.subjectantibacterial activity
dc.subjectantibiotic sensitivity
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectbacterial infection
dc.subjectbacterium isolate
dc.subjectblood
dc.subjectcarbapenem resistance
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdiagnostic test accuracy study
dc.subjectEnterobacter cloacae
dc.subjectepsilometer test
dc.subjectEscherichia coli
dc.subjectintensive care unit
dc.subjectKlebsiella pneumoniae
dc.subjectminimum inhibitory concentration
dc.subjectmorbidity
dc.subjectmortality
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectPantoea agglomerans
dc.subjectProteus mirabilis
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificity
dc.subjectsputum
dc.titleComparison of Carbapenem Resistance Detected by the BD Phoenix Automated System in Enterobacteriaceae Isolates with E-Test Method
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS