The effect of hysterectomy types on vaginal length, vaginal shortening rate and FSFI scores

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Objective: Vaginal length (VL), size and width may show individual differences among women. Hysterectomy causes VL shortening in patients, and this shortening varies according to the type of hysterectomy performed. Some studies in literature have shown that the shortened VL after hysterectomy may cause dyspareunia and have a negative effect on female sexuality. The aim of this study is to compare preoperative and postoperative vaginal lengths, vaginal shortening rate (VSR) not used before in the literature, and postoperative sexual functions according to hysterectomy types. Materials and methods: In the study, which included 136 [55 Total Abdominal Hysterectomy (TAH), 33 Vaginal Hysterectomy (VH), 48 Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (TLH)] sexually active patients under the age of 60 who underwent hysterectomy, the patients were divided into three groups according to the type of hysterectomy performed. Groups were compared in terms of demographic variables, preoperative/postop and control VL, vaginal shortening rate and The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores. Results: Vaginal lengths measured after TLH was longer and vaginal lengths measured after VAH was shorter, the difference was significant (p < 0.01). VSRs were 15.9% in TAH group, 10.9% in VH group and 8.3% in TLH group (p < 0.05). Total FSFI score was higher in TLH group than TAH and VH group (p < 0.01). Group of VSR>15% had statistically significantly lower FSFI scores in lubrication, orgasm, pain and total score than both the VSR<10% group and the VSR 10–15% group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Calculating the VSR after hysterectomy instead of postoperative VL measurement will allow us to obtain more individual and accurate results in predicting postoperative sexual functions. We found that TLH is the best hysterectomy method in terms of preserving sexual functions due to less loss of vaginal tissue in the postoperative period from these three techniques that are frequently. © 2022

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12910Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2022.02.042Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKiremitli, S.
dc.contributor.authorKiremitli, T.
dc.contributor.authorUlug, P.
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, N.
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, B.
dc.contributor.authorKulhan, M.
dc.contributor.authorKulhan, N.G.
dc.contributor.authorDinc, K.
dc.contributor.authorKirkinci, A.
dc.contributor.authorKurnuc, F.Z.
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:27:46.036479925Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:27:46.036479925Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractObjective: Vaginal length (VL), size and width may show individual differences among women. Hysterectomy causes VL shortening in patients, and this shortening varies according to the type of hysterectomy performed. Some studies in literature have shown that the shortened VL after hysterectomy may cause dyspareunia and have a negative effect on female sexuality. The aim of this study is to compare preoperative and postoperative vaginal lengths, vaginal shortening rate (VSR) not used before in the literature, and postoperative sexual functions according to hysterectomy types. Materials and methods: In the study, which included 136 [55 Total Abdominal Hysterectomy (TAH), 33 Vaginal Hysterectomy (VH), 48 Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (TLH)] sexually active patients under the age of 60 who underwent hysterectomy, the patients were divided into three groups according to the type of hysterectomy performed. Groups were compared in terms of demographic variables, preoperative/postop and control VL, vaginal shortening rate and The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores. Results: Vaginal lengths measured after TLH was longer and vaginal lengths measured after VAH was shorter, the difference was significant (p < 0.01). VSRs were 15.9% in TAH group, 10.9% in VH group and 8.3% in TLH group (p < 0.05). Total FSFI score was higher in TLH group than TAH and VH group (p < 0.01). Group of VSR>15% had statistically significantly lower FSFI scores in lubrication, orgasm, pain and total score than both the VSR<10% group and the VSR 10–15% group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Calculating the VSR after hysterectomy instead of postoperative VL measurement will allow us to obtain more individual and accurate results in predicting postoperative sexual functions. We found that TLH is the best hysterectomy method in terms of preserving sexual functions due to less loss of vaginal tissue in the postoperative period from these three techniques that are frequently. © 2022
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tjog.2022.02.042
dc.identifier.endpage432
dc.identifier.issn1028-4559
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmid35595433
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85126926089
dc.identifier.startpage427
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12910
dc.identifier.volume61
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000806635300007
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofTaiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectFSFI
dc.subjectHysterectomy
dc.subjectSexual function after hysterectomy
dc.subjectVaginal length
dc.subjectVaginal shortening rate
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectHysterectomy, Vaginal
dc.subjectLaparoscopy
dc.subjectPostoperative Complications
dc.subjectPostoperative Period
dc.subjectVagina
dc.subjectabdominal hysterectomy
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectanthropometric parameters
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectdemography
dc.subjectFemale Sexual Function Index
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectlaparoscopic hysterectomy
dc.subjectlubrication
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectorgasm
dc.subjectpreoperative evaluation
dc.subjectpreoperative period
dc.subjectsexual function
dc.subjectvaginal hysterectomy
dc.subjectadverse event
dc.subjectpostoperative complication
dc.titleThe effect of hysterectomy types on vaginal length, vaginal shortening rate and FSFI scores
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus9
rdl.citation.wos8
rdl.departmentErzincan Binali Yildirim University, Medical Faculty, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erzincan, Turkey. Electronic address: sevvilcaglar@hotmail.com. | Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Medical Faculty, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erzincan, Turkey. Electronic address: tkiremitli@hotmail.com. | Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Medical Faculty, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erzincan, Turkey. Electronic address: pasaulug@hotmail.com. | Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Medical Faculty, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erzincan, Turkey. Electronic address: nesrin_6554@hotmail.com. | Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Medical Faculty, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erzincan, Turkey. Electronic address: drbetulkalkan@gmail.com. | Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Medical Faculty, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erzincan, Turkey
rdl.departmentSelcuk University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konya, Turkey. Electronic address: mehmet_kulhan@yahoo.com. | Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Medical Faculty, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erzincan, Turkey
rdl.departmentKonya City Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konya, Turkey. Electronic address: gozdemirel1@hotmail.com. | Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Medical Faculty, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erzincan, Turkey. Electronic address: dr.kemaldinc@hotmail.com. | Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Medical Faculty, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erzincan, Turkey. Electronic address: ahmetkirkinci@hotmail.com. | Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Medical Faculty, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erzincan, Turkey. Electronic address: fatmakurnuc@hotmail.com.
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)