Trauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Introduction: Quality in medical care must be measured in order to be improved. Trauma management is part of health care, and by definition, it must be checked constantly. The only way to measure quality and outcomes is to systematically accrue data and analyze them. Material and methods: A systematic revision of the literature about quality indicators in trauma associated to an international consensus conference Results: An internationally approved base core set of 82 trauma quality indicators was obtained: Indicators were divided into 6 fields: prevention, structure, process, outcome, post-traumatic management, and society integrational effects. Conclusion: Present trauma quality indicator core set represents the result of an international effort aiming to provide a useful tool in quality evaluation and improvement. Further improvement may only be possible through international trauma registry development. This will allow for huge international data accrual permitting to evaluate results and compare outcomes. © 2021, The Author(s).

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13247Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-021-00350-7Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorCoccolini, Federico
dc.contributor.authorKluger, Yoram
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Ernest E.
dc.contributor.authorMaier, Ronald V.
dc.contributor.authorCoimbra, Raul
dc.contributor.authorOrdoñez, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorIvatury, Rao
dc.contributor.authorKirkpatrick, Andrew W.
dc.contributor.authorBiffl, Walter
dc.contributor.authorSartelli, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorHecker, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorAnsaloni, Luca
dc.contributor.authorLeppaniemi, Ari
dc.contributor.authorReva, Viktor
dc.contributor.authorCivil, Ian
dc.contributor.authorVega, Felipe
dc.contributor.authorChiarugi, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorChichom-Mefire, Alain
dc.contributor.authorSakakushev, Boris
dc.contributor.authorPeitzman, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorChiara, Osvaldo
dc.contributor.authorAbu-Zidan, Fikri
dc.contributor.authorMaegele, Marc
dc.contributor.authorMiccoli, Mario
dc.contributor.authorChirica, Mircea
dc.contributor.authorKhokha, Vladimir
dc.contributor.authorSugrue, Michael
dc.contributor.authorFraga, Gustavo P.
dc.contributor.authorOtomo, Yasuhiro
dc.contributor.authorBaiocchi, Gian Luca
dc.contributor.authorCatena, Fausto
dc.contributor.authorKuliesius, Zygimantas
dc.contributor.authorConti, Luigi
dc.contributor.authorDogjani, Agron
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jae Gil
dc.contributor.authorConsani, Heitor
dc.contributor.authorRussello, Domenico
dc.contributor.authorBortul, Marina
dc.contributor.authorMaurel, Teresa Gimenez
dc.contributor.authorKaf, Hossein Samadi
dc.contributor.authorAdamou, Harissou
dc.contributor.authorAlin, Vasilescu
dc.contributor.authorRobustelli, Umberto
dc.contributor.authorSato, Norio
dc.contributor.authorSeretis, Charalampos
dc.contributor.authorQuiodettis, Martha
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Carlos Augusto
dc.contributor.authorKong, Victor
dc.contributor.authorZakaria, Andee Dzulkarnaen
dc.contributor.authorGuner, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:28:05.334837586Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:28:05.334837586Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Quality in medical care must be measured in order to be improved. Trauma management is part of health care, and by definition, it must be checked constantly. The only way to measure quality and outcomes is to systematically accrue data and analyze them. Material and methods: A systematic revision of the literature about quality indicators in trauma associated to an international consensus conference Results: An internationally approved base core set of 82 trauma quality indicators was obtained: Indicators were divided into 6 fields: prevention, structure, process, outcome, post-traumatic management, and society integrational effects. Conclusion: Present trauma quality indicator core set represents the result of an international effort aiming to provide a useful tool in quality evaluation and improvement. Further improvement may only be possible through international trauma registry development. This will allow for huge international data accrual permitting to evaluate results and compare outcomes. © 2021, The Author(s).
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13017-021-00350-7
dc.identifier.issn1749-7922
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid33622373
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85101919470
dc.identifier.startpage6
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13247
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Journal of Emergency Surgery
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAnalysis
dc.subjectData
dc.subjectMorbidity
dc.subjectMortality
dc.subjectOutcome
dc.subjectPerformance
dc.subjectPlanning
dc.subjectProduct
dc.subjectSystem
dc.subjectWorld
dc.subjectConsensus
dc.subjectDelphi Technique
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInternationality
dc.subjectQuality Indicators, Health Care
dc.subjectTraumatology
dc.subjectDelphi study
dc.subjecthealth care quality
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinternational cooperation
dc.titleTrauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus32
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS