The Securitization of the Syrian Refugee Crisis Through Political Party Discourses

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

The present study investigates major Turkish political party discourses about the Syrian refugees in Turkey based on parties’ manifestoes and pamphlets. The refugee problem increased nationalist feelings in Turkey specifically when the president of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, explained that the Syrians could be naturalized. To analyse this situation, we draw on theories on securitization and xenophobia. Political party discourses were analysed by Nvivo 11 software program. The results suggest that while the Justice and Development Party (AKP) uses historical–cultural and Islamic discourses, the CHP has an economic discourse. The MHP, the Turkish nationalist party, and the HDP, the Kurdish nationalist party, both deploy nationalist discourses. Members of the CHP claim that the Syrians are the source of major crimes and unemployment. The AKP adopts an Ensar–Muhacir (guest–host) discourse because of its Islamic approach to the refugees. Political parties in Turkey securitize the Syrian refugee crisis through their political discourses, which result in the rise of xenophobia in Turkey. The study suggests that political parties lead to the rise in anti-refugee attitude. © 2018, Springer Nature B.V.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13703Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-018-0637-2Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorGulmez, Recep
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:28:31.726222759Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:28:31.726222759Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThe present study investigates major Turkish political party discourses about the Syrian refugees in Turkey based on parties’ manifestoes and pamphlets. The refugee problem increased nationalist feelings in Turkey specifically when the president of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, explained that the Syrians could be naturalized. To analyse this situation, we draw on theories on securitization and xenophobia. Political party discourses were analysed by Nvivo 11 software program. The results suggest that while the Justice and Development Party (AKP) uses historical–cultural and Islamic discourses, the CHP has an economic discourse. The MHP, the Turkish nationalist party, and the HDP, the Kurdish nationalist party, both deploy nationalist discourses. Members of the CHP claim that the Syrians are the source of major crimes and unemployment. The AKP adopts an Ensar–Muhacir (guest–host) discourse because of its Islamic approach to the refugees. Political parties in Turkey securitize the Syrian refugee crisis through their political discourses, which result in the rise of xenophobia in Turkey. The study suggests that political parties lead to the rise in anti-refugee attitude. © 2018, Springer Nature B.V.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12134-018-0637-2
dc.identifier.eissn1874-6365
dc.identifier.endpage906
dc.identifier.issn1488-3473
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85058394709
dc.identifier.startpage887
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13703
dc.identifier.volume20
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000480793100014
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlands
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of International Migration and Integration
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectPolitical party discourse
dc.subjectSecuritization
dc.subjectSyrian refugee crisis
dc.subjectTurkey
dc.subjectXenophobia
dc.subjectChandipura virus
dc.subjectacculturation
dc.subjectcultural relations
dc.subjectimmigrant population
dc.subjectparty politics
dc.subjectpolitical relations
dc.subjectrefugee
dc.subjectstate role
dc.titleThe Securitization of the Syrian Refugee Crisis Through Political Party Discourses
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus27
rdl.citation.wos22
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)