Acute mesenteric lymphadenitis in children: Findings related to differential diagnosis and hospitalization

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Introduction: Diagnostic discrimination between acute appendicitis (AA) and mesenteric lymphadenitis (AML) may require more diagnostic tests or great skill after excluding other diagnoses. This study aimed to make a differential diagnosis between AA and AML patients with previous and new parameters and to examine which parameters should be taken into account regarding whether the AML patient should be hospitalized or discharged. Material and methods: One hundred and twenty-three AML and 134 AA patients, randomly selected, were included in the study. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of all subjects were analyzed. Ultrasonographic and rarely computed tomography examinations evaluating for the enlarged lymph nodes with the shortest diameter in the right lower quadrant of the AML patients were performed. Also, the erect abdominal radiographs (EAR) of AML and AA patients were evaluated. Results: While there was no statistically significant difference in age or gender, C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, monocyte percentage as well as symptoms between the AA and AML groups (p > 0.05), neutrophil and lymphocyte percentage, appearance of EAR and L/M ratio were significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.05). There was no correlation between the short-axis diameter of the mesenteric lymph node and clinical and laboratory findings in the AML group (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Based on the results with ROC curve analysis, we propose to take into account the L/M ratio and the EAR from the parameters in the differential diagnosis between AA and AML in addition to previously reported parameters. Also, we recommend that the same features may be used to decide whether AML patients under observation are hospitalized or not. © 2018 Termedia & Banach.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13920Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2018.79430Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorOzdamar, Mustafa Yasar
dc.contributor.authorKaravas, Erdal
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:28:43.268994629Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:28:43.268994629Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Diagnostic discrimination between acute appendicitis (AA) and mesenteric lymphadenitis (AML) may require more diagnostic tests or great skill after excluding other diagnoses. This study aimed to make a differential diagnosis between AA and AML patients with previous and new parameters and to examine which parameters should be taken into account regarding whether the AML patient should be hospitalized or discharged. Material and methods: One hundred and twenty-three AML and 134 AA patients, randomly selected, were included in the study. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of all subjects were analyzed. Ultrasonographic and rarely computed tomography examinations evaluating for the enlarged lymph nodes with the shortest diameter in the right lower quadrant of the AML patients were performed. Also, the erect abdominal radiographs (EAR) of AML and AA patients were evaluated. Results: While there was no statistically significant difference in age or gender, C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, monocyte percentage as well as symptoms between the AA and AML groups (p > 0.05), neutrophil and lymphocyte percentage, appearance of EAR and L/M ratio were significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.05). There was no correlation between the short-axis diameter of the mesenteric lymph node and clinical and laboratory findings in the AML group (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Based on the results with ROC curve analysis, we propose to take into account the L/M ratio and the EAR from the parameters in the differential diagnosis between AA and AML in addition to previously reported parameters. Also, we recommend that the same features may be used to decide whether AML patients under observation are hospitalized or not. © 2018 Termedia & Banach.
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/aoms.2018.79430
dc.identifier.eissn1896-9151
dc.identifier.endpage320
dc.identifier.issn1734-1922
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7069435
dc.identifier.pmid32190142
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85069651751
dc.identifier.startpage313
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13920
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000518443900010
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTermedia Publishing House Ltd.
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Medical Science
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAcute appendicitis
dc.subjectChildren
dc.subjectDifferential diagnosis
dc.subjectMesenteric lymphadenitis
dc.subjectC reactive protein
dc.subjectabdominal radiography
dc.subjectadolescent
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectchild
dc.subjectcomputer assisted tomography
dc.subjectdemography
dc.subjectechography
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthospital discharge
dc.subjecthospital patient
dc.subjecthospitalization
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectlaboratory test
dc.subjectlymphadenopathy
dc.subjectlymphocyte percentage
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmedical record review
dc.subjectmesentery lymph node
dc.subjectmonocyte count
dc.subjectmonocyte percentage
dc.subjectneutrophil percentage
dc.subjectretrospective study
dc.titleAcute mesenteric lymphadenitis in children: Findings related to differential diagnosis and hospitalization
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus13
rdl.citation.wos9
rdl.departmentDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, Turkey. | Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, Turkey.
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)