Comparison of 3 techniques in percutaneous tracheostomy: Traditional landmark technique; ultrasonography-guided long-axis approach; and short-axis approach – Randomised controlled study

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Introduction: The aim of this study is to compare the reliabilities of the traditional landmark method, ultrasonography-guided long-axis in-plane application, and ultrasonography-guided short-axis out-of-plane application in percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Patients and methods: A total of 60 patients were divided in 3 random groups undergoing percutaneous tracheostomy by using landmark method, ultrasonography-guided out-of-plane method, and ultrasonography-guided in-plane method. While demographic data of the patients were recorded before the procedure, number of punctures, success rate at the first entry, rate of successful tracheostomy tube placement, total tracheostomy time, and complications were recorded during and after the procedure. Results and discussion: It was found that 23 women and 37 men were included in the study, the average age of the cases was 68.0 ± 15.5; mean body mass index was 27.9 ± 4.3; mean APACHE II scores were 27.4 ± 4.6 and there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic data. The ultrasonography-guided out-of-plane application had significantly lower number of punctures, higher first entry success, and fewer complications compared to the other groups. Independently from the groups, first entry success was significantly low in advanced age and number of punctures significantly increased the complication rate. Conclusion: In this randomised controlled study, it was found that ultrasonography-guided out-of-plane application had lower number of punctures, higher first entry success rate, and less complications. It was observed that advanced age negatively affected the first entry success and as number of punctures increased, the complication rate increased. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02855749. © 2017 Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar)

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/14052Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2017.11.011Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKupeli, I.
dc.contributor.authorNalbant, R.A.
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:28:50.502190197Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:28:50.502190197Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of this study is to compare the reliabilities of the traditional landmark method, ultrasonography-guided long-axis in-plane application, and ultrasonography-guided short-axis out-of-plane application in percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Patients and methods: A total of 60 patients were divided in 3 random groups undergoing percutaneous tracheostomy by using landmark method, ultrasonography-guided out-of-plane method, and ultrasonography-guided in-plane method. While demographic data of the patients were recorded before the procedure, number of punctures, success rate at the first entry, rate of successful tracheostomy tube placement, total tracheostomy time, and complications were recorded during and after the procedure. Results and discussion: It was found that 23 women and 37 men were included in the study, the average age of the cases was 68.0 ± 15.5; mean body mass index was 27.9 ± 4.3; mean APACHE II scores were 27.4 ± 4.6 and there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic data. The ultrasonography-guided out-of-plane application had significantly lower number of punctures, higher first entry success, and fewer complications compared to the other groups. Independently from the groups, first entry success was significantly low in advanced age and number of punctures significantly increased the complication rate. Conclusion: In this randomised controlled study, it was found that ultrasonography-guided out-of-plane application had lower number of punctures, higher first entry success rate, and less complications. It was observed that advanced age negatively affected the first entry success and as number of punctures increased, the complication rate increased. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02855749. © 2017 Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.accpm.2017.11.011
dc.identifier.endpage538
dc.identifier.issn2352-5568
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pmid29225012
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85039161803
dc.identifier.startpage533
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/14052
dc.identifier.volume37
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000453619900016
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Masson SAS
dc.relation.ispartofAnaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectPercutaneous dilatational tracheostomy
dc.subjectTraditional landmark method
dc.subjectUltrasonography-guided long-axis in-plane application
dc.subjectUltrasonography-guided short-axis out-of-plane application
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectAnatomic Landmarks
dc.subjectAPACHE
dc.subjectBody Mass Index
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIntubation, Intratracheal
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPostoperative Complications
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectTracheostomy
dc.subjectUltrasonography, Interventional
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.subjectanatomic landmark
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcomparative effectiveness
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectechography
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectintermethod comparison
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectpercutaneous tracheostomy
dc.titleComparison of 3 techniques in percutaneous tracheostomy: Traditional landmark technique; ultrasonography-guided long-axis approach; and short-axis approach – Randomised controlled study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus16
rdl.citation.wos14
rdl.departmentAnaesthesiology and intensive care department, Erzincan university, Mengucek Gazi Training and Research Hospital, 24000 Erzincan, Turkey. Electronic address: ilkeser2004@gmail.com. | Anaesthesiology and intensive care department, Erzincan university, Mengucek Gazi Training and Research Hospital, 24000 Erzincan, Turkey. Electronic address: remziyeglnhr@hotmail.com.
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)