Shouldice herniorrhaphy - Still an effective technique: A retrospective cohort study

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Aim Only 4.8% of general surgeons in our country prefer Shouldice herniorrhaphy in primary inguinal hernia repair. In the evaluation of postoperative complications, this technique, which has the closest results to Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy, could be the preferred method in selected cases of primary inguinal hernia repair. It does not only provide an alternative to the surgeon, but it can also be the first choice in cases where mesh repair cannot be applied. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Shouldice herniorrhaphy in patients who got the primary inguinal hernia diagnosis, comparing Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy. Patients and method Our study was done two-centred. We followed 48 patients who were operated with Lichtenstein technique for a diagnosis of primary inguinal hernia at the General Surgery Clinic of Erzincan Mengücek Gazi Training and Research Hospital between February 2011 and February 2014 and 42 patients who were applied Shouldice technique at Bulancak State Hospital General Surgery Department between January 2010 and February 2013. The patients were evaluated in respect of age, gender, hernia area, hernia type and early or late complications. Findings In respect of early complications, urine retention developed in only 2 (4.7%) patients of the Shouldice group. In the Lichtenstein group, complications developed in a total of 3 (6.3%) patients, as superficial infection was observed in 1 patient, seroma in 1 and urinary retention in 1. When we searched late-stage complications of the patients, paraesthesia developed in the inguinal area of 1 (2.3%) patient in the Shouldice group, and neuralgia developed in 2 (4.1%) patients of the Lichtenstein group. No recurrence was determined in any of the patients. Conclusion In the repair of inguinal hernia, surgeons should not be tied to just one method. Shouldice herniorrhaphy is a good technique that could be the first choice when the use of mesh is not possible and could be an alternative to Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy when done appropriately. In surgical training, it should be considered after the Lichtenstein method in primary inguinal hernia repair. © 2016 The Authors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/15345Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2016.04.006Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKarakose, Oktay
dc.contributor.authorEken, Huseyin
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:30:09.675591522Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:30:09.675591522Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractAim Only 4.8% of general surgeons in our country prefer Shouldice herniorrhaphy in primary inguinal hernia repair. In the evaluation of postoperative complications, this technique, which has the closest results to Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy, could be the preferred method in selected cases of primary inguinal hernia repair. It does not only provide an alternative to the surgeon, but it can also be the first choice in cases where mesh repair cannot be applied. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Shouldice herniorrhaphy in patients who got the primary inguinal hernia diagnosis, comparing Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy. Patients and method Our study was done two-centred. We followed 48 patients who were operated with Lichtenstein technique for a diagnosis of primary inguinal hernia at the General Surgery Clinic of Erzincan Mengücek Gazi Training and Research Hospital between February 2011 and February 2014 and 42 patients who were applied Shouldice technique at Bulancak State Hospital General Surgery Department between January 2010 and February 2013. The patients were evaluated in respect of age, gender, hernia area, hernia type and early or late complications. Findings In respect of early complications, urine retention developed in only 2 (4.7%) patients of the Shouldice group. In the Lichtenstein group, complications developed in a total of 3 (6.3%) patients, as superficial infection was observed in 1 patient, seroma in 1 and urinary retention in 1. When we searched late-stage complications of the patients, paraesthesia developed in the inguinal area of 1 (2.3%) patient in the Shouldice group, and neuralgia developed in 2 (4.1%) patients of the Lichtenstein group. No recurrence was determined in any of the patients. Conclusion In the repair of inguinal hernia, surgeons should not be tied to just one method. Shouldice herniorrhaphy is a good technique that could be the first choice when the use of mesh is not possible and could be an alternative to Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy when done appropriately. In surgical training, it should be considered after the Lichtenstein method in primary inguinal hernia repair. © 2016 The Authors.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijso.2016.04.006
dc.identifier.endpage13
dc.identifier.issn2405-8572
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84968796706
dc.identifier.startpage11
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/15345
dc.identifier.volume3
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000442565200003
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Surgery Open
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectHerniorrhaphy
dc.subjectInguinal hernia
dc.subjectShouldice
dc.subjectSurgical technique
dc.subjectantibiotic agent
dc.subjectabdominal surgery
dc.subjectadolescent
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectantibiotic therapy
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectclinical evaluation
dc.subjectcohort analysis
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthospital
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinguinal region
dc.subjectLichtenstein herniorrhaphy
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectmulticenter study
dc.subjectneuralgia
dc.subjectparesthesia
dc.subjectpolypropylene suture
dc.subjectpostoperative complication
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectretrospective study
dc.subjectseroma
dc.titleShouldice herniorrhaphy - Still an effective technique: A retrospective cohort study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus3
rdl.citation.wos2
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)