A Re-Evaluation of How Well Each Country is Doing in Terms of Achieving The SDGs: An Objective Approach Based on Multi-Criteria-Decision-Analysis

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Adopting Agenda 2030, the UN issued a set of sustainable development report consisting of 17 goals. The indices created by these goals are beneficial in defining the position of a particular country across the years; however, it is relatively complex to compare its position to other countries. This is not just because it requires an extensive analysis but also because the weight of each goal must be different. It is hard to determine which goal is more important than the others, as it differs from one specialist to another. Then how should we determine the goal weights without falling into the trap of subjective suggestions? That is our question for this research paper. Therefore, we use the multiple-criteria decision-making approach (MCDM) in order to characterise each country's position more accurately. Doing so, we get diverse weights instead of just using the SDGs' arithmetical averages. Therefore, our findings show slightly different rankings than the UN's SDG report 2022.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/16268Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.1287079Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorYavuz, Selahattin
dc.contributor.authorBetul Esen, Sefika
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:33:47.731963686Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:33:47.731963686Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractAdopting Agenda 2030, the UN issued a set of sustainable development report consisting of 17 goals. The indices created by these goals are beneficial in defining the position of a particular country across the years; however, it is relatively complex to compare its position to other countries. This is not just because it requires an extensive analysis but also because the weight of each goal must be different. It is hard to determine which goal is more important than the others, as it differs from one specialist to another. Then how should we determine the goal weights without falling into the trap of subjective suggestions? That is our question for this research paper. Therefore, we use the multiple-criteria decision-making approach (MCDM) in order to characterise each country's position more accurately. Doing so, we get diverse weights instead of just using the SDGs' arithmetical averages. Therefore, our findings show slightly different rankings than the UN's SDG report 2022.
dc.identifier.doi10.21121/eab.1287079
dc.identifier.eissn2651-3021
dc.identifier.endpage198
dc.identifier.issn1303-099X
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage179
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/16268
dc.identifier.volume24
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001239683300004
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEGE UNIV, FAC ECONOMICS & ADMIN SCIENCES
dc.relation.ispartofEGE ACADEMIC REVIEW
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectMultiple-criteria
dc.subjectdecision-making
dc.subjectEntropy
dc.subjectAras
dc.subjectSustainable Development Goals
dc.subjectBURDEN
dc.subjectEconomics
dc.subjectBusiness & Economics
dc.titleA Re-Evaluation of How Well Each Country is Doing in Terms of Achieving The SDGs: An Objective Approach Based on Multi-Criteria-Decision-Analysis
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.trdizin2
rdl.citation.wos1
rdl.departmentERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)