Comparison of efficacy of intraarticular polyacrylamide hydrogel and methylprednisolone acetate in patients with knee osteoarthritis

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of intraarticular methylprednisolone acetate and an intra-articular polyacrylamide hydrogel in patients with different stages of knee osteoarthritis. Materials and Methods: Patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis and history of failed pharmacotherapy or physiotherapy interventions were included in this study. The first 64 consecutive patients got intra-articular polyacrylamide hydrogel, the latter 79 consecutive patients got intra-articular methylprednisolone acetate. Patients were evaluated by WOMAC score and self-assessment questions. Results: There was no statistically significance difference between groups when WOMAC scores and answers of self-assessment questions were compared. Conclusion: Intra-articular use of polyacrylamide hydrogel was not superior to methylprednisolone acetate, for patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/16361Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.403372Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorIssin, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorKockara, Nizamettin
dc.contributor.authorCamurcu, Ismet Yalkin
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:33:56.825404397Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:33:56.825404397Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of intraarticular methylprednisolone acetate and an intra-articular polyacrylamide hydrogel in patients with different stages of knee osteoarthritis. Materials and Methods: Patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis and history of failed pharmacotherapy or physiotherapy interventions were included in this study. The first 64 consecutive patients got intra-articular polyacrylamide hydrogel, the latter 79 consecutive patients got intra-articular methylprednisolone acetate. Patients were evaluated by WOMAC score and self-assessment questions. Results: There was no statistically significance difference between groups when WOMAC scores and answers of self-assessment questions were compared. Conclusion: Intra-articular use of polyacrylamide hydrogel was not superior to methylprednisolone acetate, for patients with knee osteoarthritis.
dc.identifier.doi10.17826/cumj.403372
dc.identifier.eissn2602-3040
dc.identifier.endpage128
dc.identifier.issn2602-3032
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage124
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/16361
dc.identifier.volume43
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000445937400018
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCUKUROVA UNIV, FAC MEDICINE
dc.relation.ispartofCUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectosteoarthritis
dc.subjectgonarthrosis
dc.subjectmethylprednisolone acetate
dc.subjectinjection
dc.subjectHYALURONIC-ACID
dc.subjectMULTICENTER
dc.subjectINJECTIONS
dc.subjectMedicine, General & Internal
dc.subjectGeneral & Internal Medicine
dc.titleComparison of efficacy of intraarticular polyacrylamide hydrogel and methylprednisolone acetate in patients with knee osteoarthritis
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.trdizin1
rdl.citation.wos3
rdl.departmentERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)