Comparison of Placental Strain Elastography Values Between Healthy Pregnant Women and Pregnant Women with Intrauterine Growth Restriction or Preeclampsia

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Objective: We aimed to determine strain elastography values in the placentas of healthy pregnant women and pregnant women with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and preeclampsia (PE). To obtain more objective data, we also examined whether strain ratio values change with placental maturation at different gestational weeks. Materials and Methods: In our prospective randomized study, 64 pregnant women were divided into groups according to the degree of placental maturation (placenta grades 1, 2, and 3) and the trimester they were in to determine strain elastography values. Strain rates of the target tissue (placenta) and subcuta- neous adipose tissue were calculated. Results: According to our study, there was no statistically significant difference between the degree of placental maturation and strain ratio values. Addi- tionally, no significant difference was detected in the strain ratio values of healthy pregnant women in the second and third trimesters. However, in cases with preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction, strain ratio values were found to be statistically significantly higher, especially in pregnant women in the second and third trimesters. We found a moderate correlation between strain ratio values and uterine artery S/D. Additionally, we observed a moderate positive correlation between strain ratio and BMI. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that placental elastography strain ratio values may increase in pregnant women with preeclampsia and IUGR. These results support previous studies. Furthermore, our study shows that placental elastography strain rate values are not affected by gestational age or placental matura- tion (second and third trimesters) in healthy pregnant women. Our study was conducted in a reference hospital with a limited number of patients and restricted ultrasound imaging facilities. Future research with a larger sample size and advanced imaging techniques is recommended to support these findings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/17499Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14744/cm.2025.84429Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorMENZILCIOGLU, MEHMET SAIT
dc.contributor.authorKÖSE, Elif
dc.contributor.authorÇETİN, Türkhun
dc.contributor.authorERGENÇ, EKREM
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:49:34.491424151Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:49:34.491424151Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractObjective: We aimed to determine strain elastography values in the placentas of healthy pregnant women and pregnant women with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and preeclampsia (PE). To obtain more objective data, we also examined whether strain ratio values change with placental maturation at different gestational weeks. Materials and Methods: In our prospective randomized study, 64 pregnant women were divided into groups according to the degree of placental maturation (placenta grades 1, 2, and 3) and the trimester they were in to determine strain elastography values. Strain rates of the target tissue (placenta) and subcuta- neous adipose tissue were calculated. Results: According to our study, there was no statistically significant difference between the degree of placental maturation and strain ratio values. Addi- tionally, no significant difference was detected in the strain ratio values of healthy pregnant women in the second and third trimesters. However, in cases with preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction, strain ratio values were found to be statistically significantly higher, especially in pregnant women in the second and third trimesters. We found a moderate correlation between strain ratio values and uterine artery S/D. Additionally, we observed a moderate positive correlation between strain ratio and BMI. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that placental elastography strain ratio values may increase in pregnant women with preeclampsia and IUGR. These results support previous studies. Furthermore, our study shows that placental elastography strain rate values are not affected by gestational age or placental matura- tion (second and third trimesters) in healthy pregnant women. Our study was conducted in a reference hospital with a limited number of patients and restricted ultrasound imaging facilities. Future research with a larger sample size and advanced imaging techniques is recommended to support these findings.
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/cm.2025.84429
dc.identifier.eissn2822-6771
dc.identifier.endpage114
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage107
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/17499
dc.identifier.volume17
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofComprehensive medicine
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectKadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum
dc.titleComparison of Placental Strain Elastography Values Between Healthy Pregnant Women and Pregnant Women with Intrauterine Growth Restriction or Preeclampsia
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.trdizin0
rdl.departmentGAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentSAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentKARADENİZ TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN