Evaluation of elementary preservice teachers' conceptual and procedural knowledge on circle and disc

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

The aim of this study is to examine the students' level of conceptual and procedural understanding for circle and disc among elementary pre-service teachers. An instrument is used to measure conceptual and procedural blow t edge on circle and disc on sample of 158 participants. Independent t- test, MANOVA test and descriptive statistics were used to analyze data. The results show that students have significantly more success on questions about procedural knowledge than about conceptual knowledge. However, this success is insufficient for both procedural and mostly conceptual knowledge considering the mid-point of the range. Finally, senior students' total achievement is significantly better than freshmen's. Descriptive analysis of conceptual knowledge questions suggests that the students either misunderstood basic concepts, their relations, the meaning and development of formulas, or don't conceptualize at all. However, they are incompetent to abstract, generalize, or transfer the knowledge to other domains, as well as solve problems with squared numbers or algebraic expressions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/19253Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorBekdemir, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T21:03:51.713716137Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T21:03:51.713716137Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to examine the students' level of conceptual and procedural understanding for circle and disc among elementary pre-service teachers. An instrument is used to measure conceptual and procedural blow t edge on circle and disc on sample of 158 participants. Independent t- test, MANOVA test and descriptive statistics were used to analyze data. The results show that students have significantly more success on questions about procedural knowledge than about conceptual knowledge. However, this success is insufficient for both procedural and mostly conceptual knowledge considering the mid-point of the range. Finally, senior students' total achievement is significantly better than freshmen's. Descriptive analysis of conceptual knowledge questions suggests that the students either misunderstood basic concepts, their relations, the meaning and development of formulas, or don't conceptualize at all. However, they are incompetent to abstract, generalize, or transfer the knowledge to other domains, as well as solve problems with squared numbers or algebraic expressions.
dc.identifier.eissn2536-4758
dc.identifier.endpage95
dc.identifier.issn1300-5340
dc.identifier.issue43
dc.identifier.startpage83
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/19253
dc.identifier.volume2012
dc.language.isotr
dc.relation.ispartofHacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectEğitim
dc.subjectEğitim Araştırmaları
dc.titleEvaluation of elementary preservice teachers' conceptual and procedural knowledge on circle and disc
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.trdizin7
rdl.departmentERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN