Balkarlı, Ezgi; Kıymet, Elif; Böncüoğlu, Elif; Şahinkaya, Şahika; Çelebi, Miray Yılmaz; Apa, Hurşit; Meşe, Timur; Ağın, Hasan; Bayram, Süleyman Nuri; Devrim, İlker

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic tests and treatments applied in patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) and to determine the effect of the disease on health costs. Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort study included 59 MIS-C patients (40 males, 19 females; mean age: 7.7±4.2 years; range, 4 months to 16.5 years) who were admitted and treated between April 1, 2020, and November 1, 2021. Demographic and clinical features with hospital costs and length of stay were retrospectively reviewed from the medical files and computerized system of the hospital. Direct medical care costs of items were calculated with the hospital perspective using a combination of microcosting technique (resource-based accounting method) and hospital list data. Cases were classified as mild, moderate, or severe, and the patients were divided into two groups: the mild group and the moderate-severe group. Classification was determined by the vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), degree of respiratory support, and evidence of organ damage. Results: The mean age of the cases in the mild group was 6.5±3.7 years, and the mean age of the cases in the moderate-severe group was 9.2±4.3 years. Of 59 patients, 19 (32.2%) were followed up in the pediatric intensive care unit. The median duration of hospitalization in the hospital was 8 (interquartile range: 7-12) days. The total cost of the patients hospitalized with the diagnosis of MIS-C during the study period was 849,242.93$, and the mean cost per patient was 14,393.94±9,631.92$. In the distribution of the total cost of hospitalization according to expenses, the highest rate was pharmacy and blood products (51.99%) and IVIG costs (43.99%). While the mean total cost per person was 13,682.87±8,799.63$ in mild cases, it was 16,433.82±9,440.02$ in moderate-severe cases, and no statistically significant relationship was found between the two groups (p>0.05). There was no difference in the mean cost per patient between the cases with and without heart, lung, kidney, or neurologic involvement and advanced respiratory support (p>0.05). There was a strong positive correlation between the total costs and age (r=0.883, n=59, p<0.0001), with increased amount of costs with increased age. Conclusion: In the study, no statistically significant correlation was found between the total cost of per person in the mild group and the moderate-severe group (p>0.05). This finding may be due to the wide use of IVIG in MIS-C treatment, in addition to low transfer rates to pediatric intensive care units due to high-flow nasal cannula usage.

Sağlam, Gonca; Ergül, Emine Esra

Objectives: This study aims to investigate coronaphobia and physical activity levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients and methods: Between December 2021 and February 2022, a total of 68 RA patients (11 males, 57 females; mean age: 48.3±10.1 years; range, 29 to 78 years) and 64 age-and sex-matched healthy individuals (4 males, 60 females; mean age: 47.9±10.2 years; range, 23 to 70 years) were included in this cross-sectional study. Demographic, physical, lifestyle, and medical characteristics of all participants were recorded. The COVID-19 Phobia Scale (C19PS) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) were administered to all participants. The RA patients were divided into two groups as: patients treated with biological and non-biological agents. The Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) were used to measure disease activity. Results: The total and subgroup scores of the C19P-S were found to be statistically significantly higher in both the biological and non-biological RA groups than in the control group (p=0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the RA groups in terms of total and subgroup C19P-S scores. The mean IPAQ score was significantly lower in the RA group using biological drugs than in the control group (p=0.002). A significant correlation was found between DAS28 and total C19P-S scores (r:0.63, p<0.05), and CDAI and total C19P-S scores (r:0.79, p<0.05). Conclusion: Patients with RA have an increased risk of coronaphobia and disease activity is correlated with coronaphobia. Patients treated with biological agents seem to have lower activity levels compared to other RA patients and healthy controls. These results should be considered in the management of RA during COVID-19 pandemic and preventive intervention strategies should be formulated to cope with coronaphobia.