Ucpunar, Hanifi; Camurcu, Yalkın; Ozcan, Cagri; Buyuk, Abdul Fettah; Tas, Suleyman Kasim; Cobden, Adem

Background: Pedal biphalangism, which was also defined as symphalangism, is seen at a frequency that cannot be ignored; however, no study can be found in the literature evaluating biphalangism in normal population in comparison to those who have foot disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of the pedal fifth toe symphalangism in normal population and in patients with foot deformity including hallux valgus, pes planus, pes cavus, and pes equinovarus. We hypothesized that pedal fifth toe symphalangism may be a predisposing factor or an accompanying structural variation for foot deformity. Materials: Patients admitted to the emergency department of our center in October and November 2016 were defined as the control group, and patients with the diagnosis of hallux valgus, pes planus, pes cavus, and pes equinovarus treated between 2011 and 2016 in our department were defined as the foot deformity group. Individuals who had anteroposterior, oblique, and lateral radiographs of foot were included in the study. Results: One thousand and four patients participated in the cross-sectional observational study. Biphalangeal fifth toe was found in 328 of 1004 (32.7%) patients. In foot deformity group (n = 672), 222 patients (33%) had biphalangeal fifth toe. In the control group, 106 (31.9%) of the 332 patients had biphalangeal fifth toe. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of biphalangeal fifth toe between the two groups (p = 0.72). Conclusions: According to the results of this study, biphalangeal fifth toe is a common pedal anatomical variant seen approximately in one-third of the population who have either foot deformity or not. This information may be valuable for podiatrist undertaking the conservative or surgical treatment of fifth toe-related disorders.

Ucpunar, Hanifi; Camurcu, Yalkin; Çöbden, Adem; Sofu, Hakan; Kis, Mehmet; Demirel, Huseyin

Purpose: This study aimed to compare functional recovery and change in morbidity status from the preoperative levels among patients who underwent two different surgical treatments for unstable intertrochanteric fracture. Methods: This retrospective comparative study enrolled 140 patients (aged >80 years) who were referred to two hospitals. Of these, 64 were treated using proximal femoral nail (PFN) and 76 were treated using hemiarthroplasty (HA). To evaluate functional recovery, primary outcome measures were cumulative illness rating scale (CIRS) score to evaluate changes in morbidity status, activity of daily living (ADL) index, and mobility scores. Results: The proportion of patients who experienced increased CIRS scores in the HA group was higher at the 3-month follow-up (p = 0.02) but similar at the 6-month follow-up (p = 0.2) in comparison to the PFN group. Treatment with HA, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of 3–4, and lower, preoperative ADL indexes were the major predictors of increased postoperative CIRS score. Impaired ambulatory ability and the need for walking aids were significantly higher in the PFN group at the 3-month follow-up (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively) but similar at the 6-month follow-up with respect to the HA group. PFN treatment and high patient body mass index were the major predictors of decreased ambulatory ability at postoperative 3 months. Conclusion: HA has several advantages, including early mobilization and decreased dependency. However, it is associated with greater blood loss, a higher need for blood transfusion, and longer surgical duration than PFN, all of which are predisposing factors for significantly higher risk of reduced CIRS scores.

Pazarci, Ozhan; Kilinc, Seyran; Camurcu, Yalkin; Bulut, Okay

Background: Gunshot injury of the hip joint was reported to constitute 2–17% of all extremity firearm injuries. However, there are few studies in the literature related to gunshot injuries of the hip joint. The aim of the current study was to present the results of 10 cases treated with arthroplasty following a gunshot injury to the hip joint together with the recommended treatment algorithm. Methods: Patients with a previous medical history of hip joint region gunshot injury who underwent total hip arthroplasty were retrospectively evaluated. Those with incomplete medical records or who were lost to follow-up were excluded. Patients were classified according to the severity of the previous gunshot injury to the hip joint region. Harris hip score (HHS) and Short Form-12 quality of life score were the main outcome measurements. Postoperative complications encountered during follow-up were recorded. Results: The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 29.9 years. The mean preoperative HHS was 25.2 points and it was 65.8 at the final follow-up. Patients with bullet fragments in the hip joint, classified as group 1, had better HHS, whereas those with contaminated hip joint with intestinal flora, classified as group 3, had worst HHS. Conclusion: Hip arthroplasty after hip joint gunshot injury is a good treatment choice in young patients to reduce pain and regain functions. However, very high infection rates can be seen in patients with accompanying intestinal injury.