AI-Assisted Dialysis Decision-Making: Assessing Agreement Between ChatGPT and Nephrologist in Initial Dialysis Indication and Prescription in Emergency and ICU Settings

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Background: Material/Methods: Results: Conclusions: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly explored as a clinical decision-support tool in nephrology; however, its real-world applicability for dialysis decision-making in emergency and intensive care unit (ICU) settings remains insufficiently studied. Hemodialysis initiation and prescription are complex, time-sensitive, and dynamic processes that require expert clinical judgment. This retrospective observational study evaluated agreement between AI-generated (ChatGPT) and nephrologistmade dialysis decisions in emergency and ICU settings. Adult patients undergoing first-time dialysis were included. Agreement was assessed for dialysis initiation, modality selection, and key prescription parameters. To ensure clinical relevance, continuous prescription variables were categorized into predefined ranges. Agreement was quantified using Gwet’s AC1 coefficient and Cramér’s V statistic. Eighty-four patients were included. AI demonstrated 100% agreement with nephrologists regarding dialysis initiation. Overall agreement for dialysis modality selection was 92.9% (Cramér’s V=0.87, P<0.001). Agreement for core dialysis prescription parameters – including blood flow rate, dialysate sodium, potassium, and calcium concentrations – was high across modalities (all P<0.001). Lower agreement was observed for ultrafiltration-related parameters, particularly ultrafiltration duration, reflecting the individualized and dynamic nature of volume management during dialysis. AI-assisted decision support demonstrated high agreement with nephrologist decisions for initial dialysis initiation, modality selection, and core prescription parameters in emergency and ICU settings. Discrepancies were primarily confined to ultrafiltration-related decisions, underscoring the necessity of ongoing bedside clinical judgment. These findings support the role of AI as a decision-support tool rather than a replacement for clinician-led dialysis management. © Med Sci Monit, 2026;.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10126Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.951942Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKara, Ali Veysel
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Ersin V.
dc.contributor.authorIslamoglu, Mahmut Sami
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Ridvan V.
dc.contributor.authorHayme, Serhat V.
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:25:22.906318006Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:25:22.906318006Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackground: Material/Methods: Results: Conclusions: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly explored as a clinical decision-support tool in nephrology; however, its real-world applicability for dialysis decision-making in emergency and intensive care unit (ICU) settings remains insufficiently studied. Hemodialysis initiation and prescription are complex, time-sensitive, and dynamic processes that require expert clinical judgment. This retrospective observational study evaluated agreement between AI-generated (ChatGPT) and nephrologistmade dialysis decisions in emergency and ICU settings. Adult patients undergoing first-time dialysis were included. Agreement was assessed for dialysis initiation, modality selection, and key prescription parameters. To ensure clinical relevance, continuous prescription variables were categorized into predefined ranges. Agreement was quantified using Gwet’s AC1 coefficient and Cramér’s V statistic. Eighty-four patients were included. AI demonstrated 100% agreement with nephrologists regarding dialysis initiation. Overall agreement for dialysis modality selection was 92.9% (Cramér’s V=0.87, P<0.001). Agreement for core dialysis prescription parameters – including blood flow rate, dialysate sodium, potassium, and calcium concentrations – was high across modalities (all P<0.001). Lower agreement was observed for ultrafiltration-related parameters, particularly ultrafiltration duration, reflecting the individualized and dynamic nature of volume management during dialysis. AI-assisted decision support demonstrated high agreement with nephrologist decisions for initial dialysis initiation, modality selection, and core prescription parameters in emergency and ICU settings. Discrepancies were primarily confined to ultrafiltration-related decisions, underscoring the necessity of ongoing bedside clinical judgment. These findings support the role of AI as a decision-support tool rather than a replacement for clinician-led dialysis management. © Med Sci Monit, 2026;.
dc.identifier.doi10.12659/msm.951942
dc.identifier.eissn1643-3750
dc.identifier.issn1234-1010
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC13069908
dc.identifier.pmid41943432
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105035036649
dc.identifier.startpagee951942
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10126
dc.identifier.volume32
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001738274300001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInternational Scientific Information, Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Science Monitor
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligence
dc.subjectComparative Study
dc.subjectDialysis
dc.subjectEmergency Medical Services
dc.subjectIntensive Care Units
dc.subjectNephrology
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectClinical Decision-Making
dc.subjectDecision Making
dc.subjectDecision Support Systems, Clinical
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGenerative Artificial Intelligence
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectNephrologists
dc.subjectRenal Dialysis
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectcreatinine
dc.subjectnitrogen
dc.subjectarterial gas
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectChatGPT
dc.subjectclinical decision making
dc.subjectclinical decision support system
dc.subjectcoronary artery disease
dc.subjectdiabetes mellitus
dc.subjectemergency health service
dc.subjectemergency ward
dc.titleAI-Assisted Dialysis Decision-Making: Assessing Agreement Between ChatGPT and Nephrologist in Initial Dialysis Indication and Prescription in Emergency and ICU Settings
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus1
rdl.citation.wos1
rdl.departmentDepartment of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, Turkey. | Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, Turkey. | Department of Statistics, Faculty of Medicin, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, Turkey.
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)