State-specific respiratory signatures for affective and stress recognition: Interpretable respiratory markers, autocorrelation lags, and compact CNN models
Özet
Respiratory activity is a direct and interpretable physiological channel for wearable stress and affective-state recognition, yet many studies emphasize classification accuracy without identifying which respiratory properties separate different states. This work reframes RESP-based recognition as a joint predictive and explanatory problem. Using the chest respiratory channel of the WESAD dataset, we analyze 60 s windows under leave-one-subject-out validation and combine two complementary branches: compact raw-signal one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1D-CNNs) and physically grouped handcrafted respiratory signatures. The primary application task is binary stress versus non-stress detection, while baseline, stress, amusement, and meditation are additionally analyzed in a one-vs-rest setting to reveal state-specific respiratory markers. The feature space is organized into respiratory timing, breath-to-breath variability, waveform statistics, spectral/time–frequency descriptors, and autocorrelation/nonlinear predictability descriptors, with the raw 60 s signal treated as a sixth representation for the CNN branch. We introduce autocorrelation transition lags (Zpm/Zmp) as interpretable markers of respiratory correlation scale and separately evaluate exploratory forecast-error-growth/Lyapunov-like descriptors. In the final CNN refit setting, the raw-signal model achieved the strongest stress-vs-rest performance (accuracy 96.72%, macro-F1 95.30%, MCC 90.61%). In contrast, compact feature models were stronger for baseline (MCC 65.34%), amusement (MCC 35.69%), and especially meditation (MCC 88.65%). Strict nested reanalysis of the auxiliary Top-20 stress search yielded mean MCC=82.29% versus 85.45% originally, indicating modest selection optimism. These results show that CNNs are most useful for the practical stress detector, whereas interpretable respiratory signatures provide stronger and more physiologically transparent state-specific markers for several non-stress conditions. © 2026 Elsevier Ltd
Anahtar Kelimeler
Tam Kayıt
| Alan | Değer | Dil |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Velichko, Andrei | |
| dc.contributor.author | Huyut, Mehmet Tahir | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-18T20:25:31.412693055Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-18T20:25:31.412693055Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2027 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Respiratory activity is a direct and interpretable physiological channel for wearable stress and affective-state recognition, yet many studies emphasize classification accuracy without identifying which respiratory properties separate different states. This work reframes RESP-based recognition as a joint predictive and explanatory problem. Using the chest respiratory channel of the WESAD dataset, we analyze 60 s windows under leave-one-subject-out validation and combine two complementary branches: compact raw-signal one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1D-CNNs) and physically grouped handcrafted respiratory signatures. The primary application task is binary stress versus non-stress detection, while baseline, stress, amusement, and meditation are additionally analyzed in a one-vs-rest setting to reveal state-specific respiratory markers. The feature space is organized into respiratory timing, breath-to-breath variability, waveform statistics, spectral/time–frequency descriptors, and autocorrelation/nonlinear predictability descriptors, with the raw 60 s signal treated as a sixth representation for the CNN branch. We introduce autocorrelation transition lags (Zpm/Zmp) as interpretable markers of respiratory correlation scale and separately evaluate exploratory forecast-error-growth/Lyapunov-like descriptors. In the final CNN refit setting, the raw-signal model achieved the strongest stress-vs-rest performance (accuracy 96.72%, macro-F1 95.30%, MCC 90.61%). In contrast, compact feature models were stronger for baseline (MCC 65.34%), amusement (MCC 35.69%), and especially meditation (MCC 88.65%). Strict nested reanalysis of the auxiliary Top-20 stress search yielded mean MCC=82.29% versus 85.45% originally, indicating modest selection optimism. These results show that CNNs are most useful for the practical stress detector, whereas interpretable respiratory signatures provide stronger and more physiologically transparent state-specific markers for several non-stress conditions. © 2026 Elsevier Ltd | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant no. 22-11-00055-P ). | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.bspc.2026.111373 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1746-8108 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1746-8094 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105050651548 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 111373 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10283 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 129 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001874528300001 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Biomedical Signal Processing and Control | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | Affective-state recognition | |
| dc.subject | Autocorrelation lag | |
| dc.subject | Interpretable features | |
| dc.subject | LOSO validation | |
| dc.subject | One-dimensional convolutional neural network | |
| dc.subject | One-vs-rest analysis | |
| dc.subject | Respiratory signal | |
| dc.subject | Stress recognition | |
| dc.subject | WESAD | |
| dc.subject | Convolution | |
| dc.subject | Convolutional neural networks | |
| dc.subject | Correlation detectors | |
| dc.subject | Feature extraction | |
| dc.subject | Physiological models | |
| dc.subject | Physiology | |
| dc.subject | Respirators | |
| dc.subject | Respiratory mechanics | |
| dc.subject | Signal analysis | |
| dc.subject | State estimation | |
| dc.subject | Stresses | |
| dc.subject | Wearable technology | |
| dc.subject | Affective state | |
| dc.subject | Auto correlation | |
| dc.subject | Convolutional neural network | |
| dc.subject | Interpretable feature | |
| dc.subject | One-dimensional | |
| dc.subject | One-vs-rest analyze | |
| dc.subject | Respiratory signals | |
| dc.subject | State recognition | |
| dc.subject | Autocorrelation | |
| dc.title | State-specific respiratory signatures for affective and stress recognition: Interpretable respiratory markers, autocorrelation lags, and compact CNN models | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| rdl.citation.scopus | 0 | |
| rdl.citation.wos | 0 | |
| rdl.oa.status | gold | |
| rdl.source.index | SCOPUS | |
| rdl.source.index | WOS | |
| rdl.wos.index | Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) |
