Evaluating artificial intelligence for a focal nodular hyperplasia diagnosis using magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary findings

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) of the liver using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare its perfor mance with that of radiologists. METHODS In the first phase of the study, the MRIs of 60 patients (30 patients with FNH and 30 patients with no lesions or lesions other than FNH) were processed using a segmentation program and introduced to an AI model. After the learning process, the MRIs of 42 different patients that the AI model had no experience with were introduced to the system. In addition, a radiology resident and a radiology specialist evaluated patients with the same MR sequences. The sensitivity and specificity values were obtained from all three reviews. RESULTS The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the AI model were found to be 0.769, 0.966, 0.909, and 0.903, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity values were higher than those of the radiology resident and lower than those of the radiology specialist. The results of the specialist versus the AI model revealed a good agreement level, with a kappa (κ) value of 0.777. CONCLUSION For the diagnosis of FNH, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the AI device were higher than those of the radiology resident and lower than those of the radiology specialist. With additional studies focused on different specific lesions of the liver, AI models are expected to be able to diagnose each liver lesion with high accuracy in the future. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE AI is studied to provide assisted or automated interpretation of radiological images with an accurate and reproducible imaging diagnosis. © @Author(s)-Available online at dirjournal.org.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10907Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2025.243095Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKantarcı, Mecit
dc.contributor.authorKızılgöz, Volkan
dc.contributor.authorTerzi, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorKılıç, Ahmet Enes
dc.contributor.authorKabalcı, Halime
dc.contributor.authorDurmaz, Önder
dc.contributor.authorTokgöz, Nil
dc.contributor.authorHarman, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorKahraman, Ayşegül Sağır
dc.contributor.authorAvanaz, Ali
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Sonay
dc.contributor.authorElpek, Gülsüm Özlem
dc.contributor.authorYazol, Merve
dc.contributor.authorAydınlı, Bülent
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:26:01.098051094Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:26:01.098051094Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) of the liver using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare its perfor mance with that of radiologists. METHODS In the first phase of the study, the MRIs of 60 patients (30 patients with FNH and 30 patients with no lesions or lesions other than FNH) were processed using a segmentation program and introduced to an AI model. After the learning process, the MRIs of 42 different patients that the AI model had no experience with were introduced to the system. In addition, a radiology resident and a radiology specialist evaluated patients with the same MR sequences. The sensitivity and specificity values were obtained from all three reviews. RESULTS The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the AI model were found to be 0.769, 0.966, 0.909, and 0.903, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity values were higher than those of the radiology resident and lower than those of the radiology specialist. The results of the specialist versus the AI model revealed a good agreement level, with a kappa (κ) value of 0.777. CONCLUSION For the diagnosis of FNH, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the AI device were higher than those of the radiology resident and lower than those of the radiology specialist. With additional studies focused on different specific lesions of the liver, AI models are expected to be able to diagnose each liver lesion with high accuracy in the future. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE AI is studied to provide assisted or automated interpretation of radiological images with an accurate and reproducible imaging diagnosis. © @Author(s)-Available online at dirjournal.org.
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/dir.2025.243095
dc.identifier.eissn1305-3612
dc.identifier.endpage415
dc.identifier.issn1305-3825
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC12417915
dc.identifier.pmid40134285
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105015844750
dc.identifier.startpage405
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10907
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGalenos Publishing House
dc.relation.ispartofDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence
dc.subjectdeep learning
dc.subjectfocal nodular hyperplasia
dc.subjectliver lesion
dc.subjectmagnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectImage Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
dc.subjectLiver
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPredictive Value of Tests
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificity
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.subjectgadoxetic acid
dc.subjectarea under the curve
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectbiliary cystadenoma
dc.subjectbreast cancer
dc.subjectcolon cancer
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdecision making
dc.subjectdiagnostic test accuracy study
dc.subjectechinococcosis
dc.subjecthemangioma
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectliver adenoma
dc.subjectliver cell carcinoma
dc.titleEvaluating artificial intelligence for a focal nodular hyperplasia diagnosis using magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary findings
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus1
rdl.citation.trdizin0
rdl.departmentERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentEGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentAKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentT.C. CUMHURBAŞKANLIĞI
rdl.departmentİNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN
rdl.source.indexPUBMED