Enhancing streamflow drought prediction: integrating wavelet decomposition with deep learning and quantile regression neural network models

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Drought is a significant natural hazard that severely challenges water resource management and agricultural sustainability. This study aims to propose a novel approach for predicting streamflow drought indices (SDI-3, SDI-6, and SDI-12) in humid continental (Stockholm) and semi-arid (ELdiem) climates at different time-steps. The approach utilizes a Quantile Regression Neural Network (QRNN) coupled with wavelet decomposition (WD) techniques. Six mother wavelets (haar, sym8, coif5, bior6.8, demy, and db10) were used to decompose the SDI time series into different frequency bands, helping to identify patterns and trends in drought signals. The QRNN was compared with a tree-based machine learning (ML) model and two deep learning models: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Results from stand-alone models showed that the LSTM model outperformed others in predicting SDI-3, while the QRNN model performed best in predicting SDI-6 and SDI-12 in both study regions. In the Stockholm station, the hybrid models achieved acceptable accuracy with bior6.8-LSTM2 (Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) = 0.927), bior6.8-QRNN2 (NSE = 0.962), and demy-QRNN2 (NSE = 0.984) performing best for SDI-3, SDI-6, and SDI-12 predictions during the test phase, respectively. For the ELdiem station, the db10-QRNN3 (NSE = 0.926), demy-QRNN3 (NSE = 0.934), and demy-QRNN2 (NSE = 0.981) models demonstrated superior performance during the test phase in predicting SDI-3, SDI-6, and SDI-12, highlighting the robust capability of hybrid models across two case studies. The results indicate that combining WD with ML models can produce more accurate hydrological drought predictions than traditional models. © The Author(s) 2025.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11049Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-01736-wYayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorMohammadi, Babak
dc.contributor.authorAbdallah, Mohammed
dc.contributor.authorOucheikh, Rachid
dc.contributor.authorKatipoğlu, Okan Mert
dc.contributor.authorCheraghalizadeh, Majid
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:26:09.195788165Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:26:09.195788165Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractDrought is a significant natural hazard that severely challenges water resource management and agricultural sustainability. This study aims to propose a novel approach for predicting streamflow drought indices (SDI-3, SDI-6, and SDI-12) in humid continental (Stockholm) and semi-arid (ELdiem) climates at different time-steps. The approach utilizes a Quantile Regression Neural Network (QRNN) coupled with wavelet decomposition (WD) techniques. Six mother wavelets (haar, sym8, coif5, bior6.8, demy, and db10) were used to decompose the SDI time series into different frequency bands, helping to identify patterns and trends in drought signals. The QRNN was compared with a tree-based machine learning (ML) model and two deep learning models: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Results from stand-alone models showed that the LSTM model outperformed others in predicting SDI-3, while the QRNN model performed best in predicting SDI-6 and SDI-12 in both study regions. In the Stockholm station, the hybrid models achieved acceptable accuracy with bior6.8-LSTM2 (Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) = 0.927), bior6.8-QRNN2 (NSE = 0.962), and demy-QRNN2 (NSE = 0.984) performing best for SDI-3, SDI-6, and SDI-12 predictions during the test phase, respectively. For the ELdiem station, the db10-QRNN3 (NSE = 0.926), demy-QRNN3 (NSE = 0.934), and demy-QRNN2 (NSE = 0.981) models demonstrated superior performance during the test phase in predicting SDI-3, SDI-6, and SDI-12, highlighting the robust capability of hybrid models across two case studies. The results indicate that combining WD with ML models can produce more accurate hydrological drought predictions than traditional models. © The Author(s) 2025.
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen access funding provided by Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12145-025-01736-w
dc.identifier.issn1865-0473
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85218211311
dc.identifier.startpage232
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11049
dc.identifier.volume18
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
dc.relation.ispartofEarth Science Informatics
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectData-driven modeling
dc.subjectDeep learning model
dc.subjectHydroclimatology
dc.subjectQuantile regression neural network
dc.subjectStreamflow drought index
dc.subjectWater resources
dc.subjectStockholm
dc.subjectartificial neural network
dc.subjectclimatology
dc.subjectdecomposition analysis
dc.subjectdrought
dc.subjectnatural hazard
dc.subjectprediction
dc.subjectregression analysis
dc.subjectstreamflow
dc.subjectwater management
dc.subjectwater resource
dc.subjectwavelet analysis
dc.titleEnhancing streamflow drought prediction: integrating wavelet decomposition with deep learning and quantile regression neural network models
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus18
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS