Comparing the efficacy of regorafenib and 5-fluorouracil-based rechallenge chemotherapy in the third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Background: The optimal treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after the second line is still controversial. Regorafenib has been the standard of care in this setting as it improved overall survival (OS) compared to placebo. In real-world practice chemotherapy rechallenge is also a preferred option even though supporting evidence is not enough. We aim to compare the efficacy of regorafenib and 5-fluorouracil-based (5-FU) rechallenge treatment in the third line setting of mCRC. Methods: In this retrospective multi-institutional trial, mCRC patients from 21 oncology centers who progressed after 2 lines of chemotherapy were analyzed. Patients who were treated with regorafenib or rechallenge therapy in the third-line setting were eligible. Rechallenge chemotherapy was identified as the re-use of the 5-FU based regimen which was administered in one of the previous treatment lines. OS, disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analyzed. Results: Three hundred ninety-four mCRC patients were included in the study. 128 (32.5%) were in the rechallenge, and 266 (67.5%) were in the regorafenib group. Median PFS was 5.82 months in rechallenge and 4 months in regorafenib arms (hazard ratio:1.45,95% CI, p = 0.167). DCR was higher in the rechallenge group than regorafenib (77% vs 49.5%, respectively, p = < 0.001). Median OS after the third-line treatment was 11.99 (95% CI, 9.49–14.49) and 8.08 months (95% CI, 6.88–9.29) for rechallenge and regorafenib groups, respectively (hazard ratio:1.51, 95% CI, p < 0.001). More adverse effects and discontinuation were seen with regorafenib treatment. Conclusion: Our study revealed that higher disease control and OS rates were achieved with rechallenge treatment compared to regorafenib, especially in patients who achieved disease control in one of the first two lines of therapy. © 2023, The Author(s).

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11134Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11783-5Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorTaşçı, Elif Şenocak
dc.contributor.authorOyan, Başak
dc.contributor.authorSönmez, Özlem
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Arda Ulaş
dc.contributor.authorAtcı, Muhammed Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorSakin, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorÖner, İrem
dc.contributor.authorÇınkır, Havva Yeşil
dc.contributor.authorEryılmaz, Melek Karakurt
dc.contributor.authorÇağlayan, Dilek
dc.contributor.authorBalçık, Onur Yazdan
dc.contributor.authorPaksoy, Nail
dc.contributor.authorKarabulut, Senem
dc.contributor.authorSalim, Derya Kıvrak
dc.contributor.authorBilir, Cemil
dc.contributor.authorÖzen, Miraç
dc.contributor.authorÖzçelik, Melike
dc.contributor.authorArıcan, Ali
dc.contributor.authorAkagündüz, Baran
dc.contributor.authorİnal, Ali
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Dinçer
dc.contributor.authorÖzer, Leyla
dc.contributor.authorGülmez, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorTurhal, Nazım Serdar
dc.contributor.authorEsen, Selin Aktürk
dc.contributor.authorAlgın, Efnan
dc.contributor.authorAkbaş, Sinem
dc.contributor.authorİriağaç, Yakup
dc.contributor.authorŞakalar, Teoman
dc.contributor.authorÜnal, Çağlar
dc.contributor.authorEr, Özlem
dc.contributor.authorSeçmeler, Şaban
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:26:13.906163256Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:26:13.906163256Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBackground: The optimal treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after the second line is still controversial. Regorafenib has been the standard of care in this setting as it improved overall survival (OS) compared to placebo. In real-world practice chemotherapy rechallenge is also a preferred option even though supporting evidence is not enough. We aim to compare the efficacy of regorafenib and 5-fluorouracil-based (5-FU) rechallenge treatment in the third line setting of mCRC. Methods: In this retrospective multi-institutional trial, mCRC patients from 21 oncology centers who progressed after 2 lines of chemotherapy were analyzed. Patients who were treated with regorafenib or rechallenge therapy in the third-line setting were eligible. Rechallenge chemotherapy was identified as the re-use of the 5-FU based regimen which was administered in one of the previous treatment lines. OS, disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analyzed. Results: Three hundred ninety-four mCRC patients were included in the study. 128 (32.5%) were in the rechallenge, and 266 (67.5%) were in the regorafenib group. Median PFS was 5.82 months in rechallenge and 4 months in regorafenib arms (hazard ratio:1.45,95% CI, p = 0.167). DCR was higher in the rechallenge group than regorafenib (77% vs 49.5%, respectively, p = < 0.001). Median OS after the third-line treatment was 11.99 (95% CI, 9.49–14.49) and 8.08 months (95% CI, 6.88–9.29) for rechallenge and regorafenib groups, respectively (hazard ratio:1.51, 95% CI, p < 0.001). More adverse effects and discontinuation were seen with regorafenib treatment. Conclusion: Our study revealed that higher disease control and OS rates were achieved with rechallenge treatment compared to regorafenib, especially in patients who achieved disease control in one of the first two lines of therapy. © 2023, The Author(s).
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12885-023-11783-5
dc.identifier.issn1471-2407
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid38166764
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85181247540
dc.identifier.startpage16
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11134
dc.identifier.volume24
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Cancer
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectColon cancer
dc.subjectFluouracil
dc.subjectRechallenge
dc.subjectRegorafenib
dc.subjectSurvival
dc.subjectThird-line treatment
dc.subjectColonic Neoplasms
dc.subjectColorectal Neoplasms
dc.subjectFluorouracil
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPhenylurea Compounds
dc.subjectRectal Neoplasms
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectaflibercept
dc.subjectbevacizumab
dc.subjectcapecitabine
dc.subjectcetuximab
dc.subjectfolinic acid
dc.subjectirinotecan
dc.subjectoxaliplatin
dc.subjectpanitumumab
dc.subjectcarbanilamide derivative
dc.subjectacneiform rash
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcancer chemotherapy
dc.subjectcancer growth
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdiarrhea
dc.titleComparing the efficacy of regorafenib and 5-fluorouracil-based rechallenge chemotherapy in the third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus6
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS