Irrigation water quality classification using boosting and CNN-BiGRU-Attention models: feature importance assessment using Hellinger distance
Özet
This study addresses a gap in irrigation water quality classification by comparing machine learning (ML) algorithms and deep learning (DL) models, with a focus on feature selection. Feature relevance was assessed using Hellinger distance, mutual information, and Chi-square analysis. Classifiers included boosting algorithms (AdaBoost, XGBoost, CatBoost, LightGBM, GradientBoosting, HistGradientBoosting), Extra Trees, and DL models (CNN-BiGRU and CNN-BiGRU-Attention). Performance was evaluated using standard metrics on 166 samples from Algeria’s Naama region. DL models achieved the highest accuracies (0.82–0.84) and AUC scores (0.98–0.981), followed by XGBoost and CatBoost. Feature analysis identified qiCl as most impactful (Hellinger distance = 0.248), and qiNa as most informative (mutual information= 1.0212). These findings underscore the strength of DL approaches and the value of integrated feature selection. The results offer practical insights for optimizing irrigation strategies, supporting risk assessment, and guiding sustainable water resource management. © 2025 IAHS.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Tam Kayıt
| Alan | Değer | Dil |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Zerouali, Bilel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Derdour, Abdessamed | |
| dc.contributor.author | Almalki, Abdulrahman Seraj | |
| dc.contributor.author | Katipoglu, Okan Mert | |
| dc.contributor.author | Arafat, Ahmed A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Santos, Celso Augusto Guimarães | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bailek, Nadjem | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hussein, Enas E. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-18T20:26:17.913833664Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-18T20:26:17.913833664Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study addresses a gap in irrigation water quality classification by comparing machine learning (ML) algorithms and deep learning (DL) models, with a focus on feature selection. Feature relevance was assessed using Hellinger distance, mutual information, and Chi-square analysis. Classifiers included boosting algorithms (AdaBoost, XGBoost, CatBoost, LightGBM, GradientBoosting, HistGradientBoosting), Extra Trees, and DL models (CNN-BiGRU and CNN-BiGRU-Attention). Performance was evaluated using standard metrics on 166 samples from Algeria’s Naama region. DL models achieved the highest accuracies (0.82–0.84) and AUC scores (0.98–0.981), followed by XGBoost and CatBoost. Feature analysis identified qiCl as most impactful (Hellinger distance = 0.248), and qiNa as most informative (mutual information= 1.0212). These findings underscore the strength of DL approaches and the value of integrated feature selection. The results offer practical insights for optimizing irrigation strategies, supporting risk assessment, and guiding sustainable water resource management. © 2025 IAHS. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This work was funded and supported by the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, Taif University. The authors acknowledge the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, Taif University, for funding this work. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/02626667.2025.2574864 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 3158 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0262-6667 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 16 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105023388561 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 3131 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11217 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 70 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis Ltd. | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Hydrological Sciences Journal | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | Chi-square | |
| dc.subject | feature selection | |
| dc.subject | mutual information score | |
| dc.subject | sensitivity analysis | |
| dc.subject | strong performance | |
| dc.subject | water quality management | |
| dc.subject | Adaptive boosting | |
| dc.subject | Classification (of information) | |
| dc.subject | Deep learning | |
| dc.subject | Information management | |
| dc.subject | Irrigation | |
| dc.subject | Learning systems | |
| dc.subject | Optimization | |
| dc.subject | Quality control | |
| dc.subject | Quality management | |
| dc.subject | Risk assessment | |
| dc.subject | Risk management | |
| dc.subject | Water conservation | |
| dc.subject | Water management | |
| dc.subject | Features selection | |
| dc.subject | Hellinger distance | |
| dc.subject | Learning models | |
| dc.subject | Mutual informations | |
| dc.subject | Performance | |
| dc.subject | Sensitivity analyzes | |
| dc.subject | artificial neural network | |
| dc.subject | classification | |
| dc.subject | irrigation system | |
| dc.subject | water quality | |
| dc.subject | Feature extraction | |
| dc.title | Irrigation water quality classification using boosting and CNN-BiGRU-Attention models: feature importance assessment using Hellinger distance | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| rdl.citation.scopus | 1 | |
| rdl.source.index | SCOPUS |
