Irrigation water quality classification using boosting and CNN-BiGRU-Attention models: feature importance assessment using Hellinger distance

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

This study addresses a gap in irrigation water quality classification by comparing machine learning (ML) algorithms and deep learning (DL) models, with a focus on feature selection. Feature relevance was assessed using Hellinger distance, mutual information, and Chi-square analysis. Classifiers included boosting algorithms (AdaBoost, XGBoost, CatBoost, LightGBM, GradientBoosting, HistGradientBoosting), Extra Trees, and DL models (CNN-BiGRU and CNN-BiGRU-Attention). Performance was evaluated using standard metrics on 166 samples from Algeria’s Naama region. DL models achieved the highest accuracies (0.82–0.84) and AUC scores (0.98–0.981), followed by XGBoost and CatBoost. Feature analysis identified qiCl as most impactful (Hellinger distance = 0.248), and qiNa as most informative (mutual information= 1.0212). These findings underscore the strength of DL approaches and the value of integrated feature selection. The results offer practical insights for optimizing irrigation strategies, supporting risk assessment, and guiding sustainable water resource management. © 2025 IAHS.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11217Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorZerouali, Bilel
dc.contributor.authorDerdour, Abdessamed
dc.contributor.authorAlmalki, Abdulrahman Seraj
dc.contributor.authorKatipoglu, Okan Mert
dc.contributor.authorArafat, Ahmed A.
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Celso Augusto Guimarães
dc.contributor.authorBailek, Nadjem
dc.contributor.authorHussein, Enas E.
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:26:17.913833664Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:26:17.913833664Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThis study addresses a gap in irrigation water quality classification by comparing machine learning (ML) algorithms and deep learning (DL) models, with a focus on feature selection. Feature relevance was assessed using Hellinger distance, mutual information, and Chi-square analysis. Classifiers included boosting algorithms (AdaBoost, XGBoost, CatBoost, LightGBM, GradientBoosting, HistGradientBoosting), Extra Trees, and DL models (CNN-BiGRU and CNN-BiGRU-Attention). Performance was evaluated using standard metrics on 166 samples from Algeria’s Naama region. DL models achieved the highest accuracies (0.82–0.84) and AUC scores (0.98–0.981), followed by XGBoost and CatBoost. Feature analysis identified qiCl as most impactful (Hellinger distance = 0.248), and qiNa as most informative (mutual information= 1.0212). These findings underscore the strength of DL approaches and the value of integrated feature selection. The results offer practical insights for optimizing irrigation strategies, supporting risk assessment, and guiding sustainable water resource management. © 2025 IAHS.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded and supported by the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, Taif University. The authors acknowledge the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, Taif University, for funding this work.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02626667.2025.2574864
dc.identifier.endpage3158
dc.identifier.issn0262-6667
dc.identifier.issue16
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105023388561
dc.identifier.startpage3131
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11217
dc.identifier.volume70
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.
dc.relation.ispartofHydrological Sciences Journal
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectChi-square
dc.subjectfeature selection
dc.subjectmutual information score
dc.subjectsensitivity analysis
dc.subjectstrong performance
dc.subjectwater quality management
dc.subjectAdaptive boosting
dc.subjectClassification (of information)
dc.subjectDeep learning
dc.subjectInformation management
dc.subjectIrrigation
dc.subjectLearning systems
dc.subjectOptimization
dc.subjectQuality control
dc.subjectQuality management
dc.subjectRisk assessment
dc.subjectRisk management
dc.subjectWater conservation
dc.subjectWater management
dc.subjectFeatures selection
dc.subjectHellinger distance
dc.subjectLearning models
dc.subjectMutual informations
dc.subjectPerformance
dc.subjectSensitivity analyzes
dc.subjectartificial neural network
dc.subjectclassification
dc.subjectirrigation system
dc.subjectwater quality
dc.subjectFeature extraction
dc.titleIrrigation water quality classification using boosting and CNN-BiGRU-Attention models: feature importance assessment using Hellinger distance
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus1
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS