Evaluating the Accuracy of Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Hybrid Algorithms for Flood Routing Calculations

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

The increase in average temperatures in the last century has caused global warming, which has increased the frequency of natural disasters. Floods are one of the most important natural disasters and harm the environment and especially human life. Flood routing techniques also play an important role in predicting floods. For this reason, the accuracy and precision of flood routing calculations are of vital importance in taking all necessary precautions before the floods reach the region and in preventing loss of life. This study aims to compare the performance of machine learning, deep learning and hybrid algorithms for flood routing prediction models in the Büyük Menderes River. In this research deep learning model Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM), machine learning model Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and hybrid machine learning models empirical mode decomposition (EMD)-ANN, and particle swarm optimization (PSO)-ANN algorithms were compared to forecast the flood routing results in two discharge observation stations in the Büyük Menderes river. The analysis results of the established ML algorithms were compared with statistical criteria such as mean error, mean absolute error, root mean square error and coefficient of determination. Additionally, Taylor diagrams, box plots, and beeswarm plot visual graphs were also used in this comparison analysis. At the end of the research, it was determined that the hybrid algorithm PSO-ANN was the most successful algorithm in forecasting flood routing results among other models according to the error values of MAE: 0.2514, MSE: 0.4613, RMSE: 0.6791, NSE: 0.941 and MBE: 0.047. Moreover, the LSTM algorithm was the approach with second estimation accuracy. The findings are vital in terms of taking necessary precautions and gaining time before floods reach any region. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11399Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-024-03575-0Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorSarıgöl, Metin
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:26:27.234667606Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:26:27.234667606Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThe increase in average temperatures in the last century has caused global warming, which has increased the frequency of natural disasters. Floods are one of the most important natural disasters and harm the environment and especially human life. Flood routing techniques also play an important role in predicting floods. For this reason, the accuracy and precision of flood routing calculations are of vital importance in taking all necessary precautions before the floods reach the region and in preventing loss of life. This study aims to compare the performance of machine learning, deep learning and hybrid algorithms for flood routing prediction models in the Büyük Menderes River. In this research deep learning model Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM), machine learning model Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and hybrid machine learning models empirical mode decomposition (EMD)-ANN, and particle swarm optimization (PSO)-ANN algorithms were compared to forecast the flood routing results in two discharge observation stations in the Büyük Menderes river. The analysis results of the established ML algorithms were compared with statistical criteria such as mean error, mean absolute error, root mean square error and coefficient of determination. Additionally, Taylor diagrams, box plots, and beeswarm plot visual graphs were also used in this comparison analysis. At the end of the research, it was determined that the hybrid algorithm PSO-ANN was the most successful algorithm in forecasting flood routing results among other models according to the error values of MAE: 0.2514, MSE: 0.4613, RMSE: 0.6791, NSE: 0.941 and MBE: 0.047. Moreover, the LSTM algorithm was the approach with second estimation accuracy. The findings are vital in terms of taking necessary precautions and gaining time before floods reach any region. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00024-024-03575-0
dc.identifier.eissn1420-9136
dc.identifier.endpage3506
dc.identifier.issn0033-4553
dc.identifier.issue12
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85207365234
dc.identifier.startpage3485
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11399
dc.identifier.volume181
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001342069100002
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBirkhauser
dc.relation.ispartofPure and Applied Geophysics
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectDeep learning
dc.subjectFlood routing prediction
dc.subjectHybrid machine learning
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.subjectNeural networks
dc.subjectBuyuk Menderes River
dc.subjectTurkey
dc.subjectContrastive Learning
dc.subjectFlood damage
dc.subjectLong short-term memory
dc.subjectPrediction models
dc.subjectFlood routing
dc.subjectHybrid algorithms
dc.subjectMachine learning models
dc.subjectMachine-learning
dc.subjectNatural disasters
dc.subjectNeural-networks
dc.subjectShort term memory
dc.subjectaccuracy assessment
dc.subjectalgorithm
dc.subjectartificial neural network
dc.subjectflood forecasting
dc.subjectflood frequency
dc.subjecthazard management
dc.subjectnatural disaster
dc.subjectAdversarial machine learning
dc.titleEvaluating the Accuracy of Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Hybrid Algorithms for Flood Routing Calculations
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus9
rdl.citation.wos7
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)