Determination of optimum insulation thickness of building walls according to four main directions by accounting for solar radiation: A case study of Erzincan, Türkiye
Özet
Reducing heat transfer from the building will reduce the energy cost required to heat the building. Significant energy savings of 25 % to 50 % can be achieved when the appropriate thickness of thermal insulation is applied to the building walls. In this study, calculations were made to determine the optimum insulation thickness of some thermal insulation materials used to reduce the heat transfer from buildings in Erzincan, located in Türkiye's fourth climate zone. The optimum thickness of the thermal insulation to be applied to the external walls was determined using the heating degree day method, taking into account the effect of solar radiation according to the four main directions. Optimum insulation thicknesses and payback periods were calculated for combinations of two building materials (pumice and bricks), four fuels (fuel oil, LPG, natural gas, and coal), and three insulation materials (XPS, EPS, and Rock wool). The numbers of heating degree days were calculated as 2229 in the north, 1425 in the east and west, and 1118 in the south direction for the four main wall directions. The lowest optimum insulation thickness for these heating degree day values, which minimizes the total heating cost, was obtained for pumice/XPS/natural gas combination. The optimum insulation thicknesses for this combination were calculated as 0.037 m in the north, 0.025 m in the east and west, and 0.02 m in the south direction. The calculated payback periods for all combinations range from 0.9 to 4 years and the payback period of Pumice/XPS/Natural Gas combination is 4 years. © 2023 Elsevier B.V.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Tam Kayıt
| Alan | Değer | Dil |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Köse Özturan, Merve | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kurnuç Seyhan, Aslıhan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-18T20:26:47.719786848Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-18T20:26:47.719786848Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Reducing heat transfer from the building will reduce the energy cost required to heat the building. Significant energy savings of 25 % to 50 % can be achieved when the appropriate thickness of thermal insulation is applied to the building walls. In this study, calculations were made to determine the optimum insulation thickness of some thermal insulation materials used to reduce the heat transfer from buildings in Erzincan, located in Türkiye's fourth climate zone. The optimum thickness of the thermal insulation to be applied to the external walls was determined using the heating degree day method, taking into account the effect of solar radiation according to the four main directions. Optimum insulation thicknesses and payback periods were calculated for combinations of two building materials (pumice and bricks), four fuels (fuel oil, LPG, natural gas, and coal), and three insulation materials (XPS, EPS, and Rock wool). The numbers of heating degree days were calculated as 2229 in the north, 1425 in the east and west, and 1118 in the south direction for the four main wall directions. The lowest optimum insulation thickness for these heating degree day values, which minimizes the total heating cost, was obtained for pumice/XPS/natural gas combination. The optimum insulation thicknesses for this combination were calculated as 0.037 m in the north, 0.025 m in the east and west, and 0.02 m in the south direction. The calculated payback periods for all combinations range from 0.9 to 4 years and the payback period of Pumice/XPS/Natural Gas combination is 4 years. © 2023 Elsevier B.V. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | The authors express their gratitude to the General Directorate of State Meteorological Affairs (DMI) for providing us with meteorological data. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113871 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1872-6178 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0378-7788 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85181894798 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 113871 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11798 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 304 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001152760400001 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Energy and Buildings | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | Heating degree day method | |
| dc.subject | Insulation thickness | |
| dc.subject | Solar radiation | |
| dc.subject | Energy conservation | |
| dc.subject | Investments | |
| dc.subject | Liquefied petroleum gas | |
| dc.subject | Thermal insulation | |
| dc.subject | Building walls | |
| dc.subject | Case-studies | |
| dc.subject | Degree-day method | |
| dc.subject | Energy cost | |
| dc.subject | Energy-savings | |
| dc.subject | Heating degree-days | |
| dc.subject | Optimum insulation thickness | |
| dc.subject | Payback periods | |
| dc.subject | Walls (structural partitions) | |
| dc.title | Determination of optimum insulation thickness of building walls according to four main directions by accounting for solar radiation: A case study of Erzincan, Türkiye | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| rdl.citation.scopus | 29 | |
| rdl.citation.wos | 22 | |
| rdl.source.index | SCOPUS | |
| rdl.source.index | WOS | |
| rdl.wos.index | Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) |
