Determination of optimum insulation thickness of building walls according to four main directions by accounting for solar radiation: A case study of Erzincan, Türkiye

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Reducing heat transfer from the building will reduce the energy cost required to heat the building. Significant energy savings of 25 % to 50 % can be achieved when the appropriate thickness of thermal insulation is applied to the building walls. In this study, calculations were made to determine the optimum insulation thickness of some thermal insulation materials used to reduce the heat transfer from buildings in Erzincan, located in Türkiye's fourth climate zone. The optimum thickness of the thermal insulation to be applied to the external walls was determined using the heating degree day method, taking into account the effect of solar radiation according to the four main directions. Optimum insulation thicknesses and payback periods were calculated for combinations of two building materials (pumice and bricks), four fuels (fuel oil, LPG, natural gas, and coal), and three insulation materials (XPS, EPS, and Rock wool). The numbers of heating degree days were calculated as 2229 in the north, 1425 in the east and west, and 1118 in the south direction for the four main wall directions. The lowest optimum insulation thickness for these heating degree day values, which minimizes the total heating cost, was obtained for pumice/XPS/natural gas combination. The optimum insulation thicknesses for this combination were calculated as 0.037 m in the north, 0.025 m in the east and west, and 0.02 m in the south direction. The calculated payback periods for all combinations range from 0.9 to 4 years and the payback period of Pumice/XPS/Natural Gas combination is 4 years. © 2023 Elsevier B.V.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11798Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKöse Özturan, Merve
dc.contributor.authorKurnuç Seyhan, Aslıhan
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:26:47.719786848Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:26:47.719786848Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractReducing heat transfer from the building will reduce the energy cost required to heat the building. Significant energy savings of 25 % to 50 % can be achieved when the appropriate thickness of thermal insulation is applied to the building walls. In this study, calculations were made to determine the optimum insulation thickness of some thermal insulation materials used to reduce the heat transfer from buildings in Erzincan, located in Türkiye's fourth climate zone. The optimum thickness of the thermal insulation to be applied to the external walls was determined using the heating degree day method, taking into account the effect of solar radiation according to the four main directions. Optimum insulation thicknesses and payback periods were calculated for combinations of two building materials (pumice and bricks), four fuels (fuel oil, LPG, natural gas, and coal), and three insulation materials (XPS, EPS, and Rock wool). The numbers of heating degree days were calculated as 2229 in the north, 1425 in the east and west, and 1118 in the south direction for the four main wall directions. The lowest optimum insulation thickness for these heating degree day values, which minimizes the total heating cost, was obtained for pumice/XPS/natural gas combination. The optimum insulation thicknesses for this combination were calculated as 0.037 m in the north, 0.025 m in the east and west, and 0.02 m in the south direction. The calculated payback periods for all combinations range from 0.9 to 4 years and the payback period of Pumice/XPS/Natural Gas combination is 4 years. © 2023 Elsevier B.V.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors express their gratitude to the General Directorate of State Meteorological Affairs (DMI) for providing us with meteorological data.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113871
dc.identifier.eissn1872-6178
dc.identifier.issn0378-7788
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85181894798
dc.identifier.startpage113871
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11798
dc.identifier.volume304
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001152760400001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy and Buildings
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectHeating degree day method
dc.subjectInsulation thickness
dc.subjectSolar radiation
dc.subjectEnergy conservation
dc.subjectInvestments
dc.subjectLiquefied petroleum gas
dc.subjectThermal insulation
dc.subjectBuilding walls
dc.subjectCase-studies
dc.subjectDegree-day method
dc.subjectEnergy cost
dc.subjectEnergy-savings
dc.subjectHeating degree-days
dc.subjectOptimum insulation thickness
dc.subjectPayback periods
dc.subjectWalls (structural partitions)
dc.titleDetermination of optimum insulation thickness of building walls according to four main directions by accounting for solar radiation: A case study of Erzincan, Türkiye
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus29
rdl.citation.wos22
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)