Erzincan Binali Yıldırım ÜniversitesiErzincan Binali Yıldırım ÜniversitesiAçık Erişim Arşivi · RDL Open

The usage of subgenera in taxonomy of the genus Raphignathus Dugès: a reaction to Khan et al. (2023), with the revised checklist of Raphignathidae

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

The reaction paper provides a brief response and critique Khan et al.'s (2023) proposal categorisation about dividing four subgenera of the genus Raphignathus Dugès. The present work contains following nomenclatural recommendation in Raphignathus: (1) Raphignathus bengalensisModak, 1991 and R. sayedi Gomaa and Hassan, 1986 are considered here as nomina nuda due to no formally publishing. (2) Raphignathus curtipilus Berlese, 1888 is transferred to the genus Eustigmaeus Berlese. (3) Raphignathus striatus Trägardh, 1904 is moved to the genus Prostigmaeus? Kuznetsov in Stigmaeidae based on their original descriptions and illustrations. This paper also presents a current species list for the family Raphignathidae Kramer, with a new country (Türkiye) recorded species and a case of numerical variation in its external suranal setae. © 2024 Systematic and Applied Acarology Society. All rights reserved.

Anahtar Kelimeler

AcariKarasu Valleymitenomen nudumnominal recommendationtaxonomy
RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11815Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.29.1.13Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorDoǧan, Sallh
dc.contributor.authorDoǧan, Slbel
dc.contributor.authorFan, Qing-Hai
dc.contributor.authorUǧurlu, Silfanur
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:26:48.493154243Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:26:48.493154243Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThe reaction paper provides a brief response and critique Khan et al.'s (2023) proposal categorisation about dividing four subgenera of the genus Raphignathus Dugès. The present work contains following nomenclatural recommendation in Raphignathus: (1) Raphignathus bengalensisModak, 1991 and R. sayedi Gomaa and Hassan, 1986 are considered here as nomina nuda due to no formally publishing. (2) Raphignathus curtipilus Berlese, 1888 is transferred to the genus Eustigmaeus Berlese. (3) Raphignathus striatus Trägardh, 1904 is moved to the genus Prostigmaeus? Kuznetsov in Stigmaeidae based on their original descriptions and illustrations. This paper also presents a current species list for the family Raphignathidae Kramer, with a new country (Türkiye) recorded species and a case of numerical variation in its external suranal setae. © 2024 Systematic and Applied Acarology Society. All rights reserved.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe examined specimens were collected from a project (No, 121Z986) funded by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUB.TAK). We thank TUB.TAK for his financial support. We gratefully appreciate TR Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry for providing the legal permissions for the field surveys. We also thank Dr. Hasan Huseyin Ozbek (EBYU) for helping to capture some images.
dc.identifier.doi10.11158/saa.29.1.13
dc.identifier.eissn2056-6069
dc.identifier.endpage186
dc.identifier.issn1362-1971
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85184035252
dc.identifier.startpage176
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11815
dc.identifier.volume29
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001170810900013
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSystematic and Applied Acarology Society
dc.relation.ispartofSystematic and Applied Acarology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAcari
dc.subjectKarasu Valley
dc.subjectmite
dc.subjectnomen nudum
dc.subjectnominal recommendation
dc.subjecttaxonomy
dc.titleThe usage of subgenera in taxonomy of the genus Raphignathus Dugès: a reaction to Khan et al. (2023), with the revised checklist of Raphignathidae
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus1
rdl.citation.wos1
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)