Mean S1 inlet and outlet view angles are not safe for all individuals according to three-dimensional tomographic measurements

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Although there are many studies evaluating optimal inlet and outlet angles required for the correct placement of S1 iliosacral screws, there is no study evaluating reliability and feasibility of these angles for all individuals on three-dimensional (3D) anatomical models. A total of 100 women and 100 men were selected randomly. A vertical line was created according to long axis of the tomography device on which patient was lying in supine position. The automatized best-fit planes were created on superior and inferior endplates, anterior cortex including notch region and posterior cortex of first sacral vertebrae using 3D imaging software to measure mean inlet and outlet angles. We observed no statistically significant difference between gender groups in terms of inlet and outlet angles. Mean inlet view is obtained for anterior cortex of S1 in 22.5 ± 9.5° and for posterior cortex in 46.5 ± 9.3°. Mean fluoroscopic view angle of S1 for superior outlet is 40.3 ± 7.6 and for inferior outlet is 46.9 ± 8.8. Mean anterior and posterior S1 inlet view angles do not accurately visualize anterior cortex of 74 (37%) and posterior cortex of 66 (33%) individuals. Mean superior and inferior S1 outlet view angles do not accurately visualize superior endplate of 74 (37%) and inferior endplate of 56 (28%) individuals. Due to individual alterations of spatial position of sacrum, mean inlet and outlet view angles of S1 are not sufficient to visualize the iliosacral screws under fluoroscopy in many individuals. © 2023 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11916Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25701Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorTanoğlu, Oğuzhan
dc.contributor.authorGökgöz, Mehmet Burak
dc.contributor.authorSubaşı, İzzet Özay
dc.contributor.authorArıcan, Gökhun
dc.contributor.authorKoçkara, Nizamettin
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:26:53.773965687Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:26:53.773965687Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractAlthough there are many studies evaluating optimal inlet and outlet angles required for the correct placement of S1 iliosacral screws, there is no study evaluating reliability and feasibility of these angles for all individuals on three-dimensional (3D) anatomical models. A total of 100 women and 100 men were selected randomly. A vertical line was created according to long axis of the tomography device on which patient was lying in supine position. The automatized best-fit planes were created on superior and inferior endplates, anterior cortex including notch region and posterior cortex of first sacral vertebrae using 3D imaging software to measure mean inlet and outlet angles. We observed no statistically significant difference between gender groups in terms of inlet and outlet angles. Mean inlet view is obtained for anterior cortex of S1 in 22.5 ± 9.5° and for posterior cortex in 46.5 ± 9.3°. Mean fluoroscopic view angle of S1 for superior outlet is 40.3 ± 7.6 and for inferior outlet is 46.9 ± 8.8. Mean anterior and posterior S1 inlet view angles do not accurately visualize anterior cortex of 74 (37%) and posterior cortex of 66 (33%) individuals. Mean superior and inferior S1 outlet view angles do not accurately visualize superior endplate of 74 (37%) and inferior endplate of 56 (28%) individuals. Due to individual alterations of spatial position of sacrum, mean inlet and outlet view angles of S1 are not sufficient to visualize the iliosacral screws under fluoroscopy in many individuals. © 2023 Orthopaedic Research Society.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jor.25701
dc.identifier.eissn1554-527X
dc.identifier.endpage677
dc.identifier.issn0736-0266
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmid37804215
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85174017811
dc.identifier.startpage671
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11916
dc.identifier.volume42
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001085462700001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Orthopaedic Research
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectcomputer-assisted image processing
dc.subjectfracture fixation
dc.subjectsacrum
dc.subjectthree-dimensional imaging
dc.subjecttomography
dc.subjectBays
dc.subjectBone Screws
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFracture Fixation, Internal
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIlium
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectTomography, X-Ray Computed
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectfluoroscopy
dc.subjectgender
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjecthuman experiment
dc.subjectimage processing
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectsacral vertebra
dc.subjectsoftware
dc.subjectbay
dc.subjectdiagnostic imaging
dc.subjectiliac bone
dc.subjectosteosynthesis
dc.subjectreproducibility
dc.titleMean S1 inlet and outlet view angles are not safe for all individuals according to three-dimensional tomographic measurements
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus2
rdl.citation.wos2
rdl.departmentDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey.
rdl.oa.statusopen
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)