CALCULATION OF LENS POWER WITH NEW BIOMETRIC FORMULAS; [LENS GÜCÜNÜN YENİ BİOMETRİ FORMÜLLERİ İLE HESAPLANMASI]

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Objective: Comparison of the accuracy of six biometric formulas based on refractive findings using patients' biometric and refractive data before phacoemulsification surgery. Material and Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted of the data of 65 eyes of 43 patients who underwent phacoemulsification at the Ophthalmology Department of Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine between January 2016 and July 2019. The intraocular lens (IOL) power corresponding to the target refraction value in patients was calculated using the SRK/T formula. The patients' final refraction values were obtained by examinations conducted after the third postoperative month. After implanting IOLs with the same refractive power, target refraction values were calculated using the optical biometry measurements of the patients and the Hoffer Q, T2, Ladas Super Formula (Ladas), Barrett Universal II (BU II), and Hill-RBF formulas. The refractive refraction deviation values between the formulas were compared, as well as the difference between the target refraction values determined by the formulas and the spherical equivalents of the patients' result refractions. Result: The normal age of the 43 patients in the study was 64.65±8.23 (47-86) years. The mean axial length was 23.5±0.7mm (22.01-24.5). The refractive deviation was 0.29±0.29 D with SRK/T, 0.27±0.27 D with T2, 0.3±0.24 D with Hoffer Q, 0.3±0.26 D with Ladas, and 0.33±0.28 D with BU II, and 0.27±0.29 D with Hill-RBF. The refractive deviation percentages of the formulas in the range of -1.00 D to +1.00 D were as follows: 98.5% Hoffer Q and Hill-RBF; 96.9% T2, Ladas, BU II, and SRK/T. In terms of refractive deviation values, there was no statistically significant difference between the formulas (p>0.05). Conclusion: The probability of obtaining the target refractive value with a refractive deviation within ±1 D of the six biometry formulas included in the study is 96.9% and higher. Any of these formulas can be employed safely to compute preoperative IOL power in the eyes of normal length. © 2024 Authors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12304Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26650/iuitfd.1260293Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorErgül, Elif
dc.contributor.authorAltinkurt, Emre
dc.contributor.authorUğurlu, Adem
dc.contributor.authorÇakmak, Semih
dc.contributor.authorGözüm, Nilüfer
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:27:13.039951630Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:27:13.039951630Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjective: Comparison of the accuracy of six biometric formulas based on refractive findings using patients' biometric and refractive data before phacoemulsification surgery. Material and Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted of the data of 65 eyes of 43 patients who underwent phacoemulsification at the Ophthalmology Department of Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine between January 2016 and July 2019. The intraocular lens (IOL) power corresponding to the target refraction value in patients was calculated using the SRK/T formula. The patients' final refraction values were obtained by examinations conducted after the third postoperative month. After implanting IOLs with the same refractive power, target refraction values were calculated using the optical biometry measurements of the patients and the Hoffer Q, T2, Ladas Super Formula (Ladas), Barrett Universal II (BU II), and Hill-RBF formulas. The refractive refraction deviation values between the formulas were compared, as well as the difference between the target refraction values determined by the formulas and the spherical equivalents of the patients' result refractions. Result: The normal age of the 43 patients in the study was 64.65±8.23 (47-86) years. The mean axial length was 23.5±0.7mm (22.01-24.5). The refractive deviation was 0.29±0.29 D with SRK/T, 0.27±0.27 D with T2, 0.3±0.24 D with Hoffer Q, 0.3±0.26 D with Ladas, and 0.33±0.28 D with BU II, and 0.27±0.29 D with Hill-RBF. The refractive deviation percentages of the formulas in the range of -1.00 D to +1.00 D were as follows: 98.5% Hoffer Q and Hill-RBF; 96.9% T2, Ladas, BU II, and SRK/T. In terms of refractive deviation values, there was no statistically significant difference between the formulas (p>0.05). Conclusion: The probability of obtaining the target refractive value with a refractive deviation within ±1 D of the six biometry formulas included in the study is 96.9% and higher. Any of these formulas can be employed safely to compute preoperative IOL power in the eyes of normal length. © 2024 Authors.
dc.identifier.doi10.26650/iuitfd.1260293
dc.identifier.eissn1305-6441
dc.identifier.endpage318
dc.identifier.issn1305-6433
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85181871687
dc.identifier.startpage312
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12304
dc.identifier.volume86
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001085298100001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIstanbul University Press
dc.relation.ispartofIstanbul Tip Fakultesi Dergisi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectbiometrics
dc.subjectCataract surgery
dc.subjectnew generation formulas
dc.titleCALCULATION OF LENS POWER WITH NEW BIOMETRIC FORMULAS; [LENS GÜCÜNÜN YENİ BİOMETRİ FORMÜLLERİ İLE HESAPLANMASI]
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.trdizin0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.departmentERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentİSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentT.C. SAĞLIK BAKANLIĞI
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)