Which Treatment Method Is Better in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: Corticosteroid Injection, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, or Radiofrequency Thermal Lesioning?

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Background: Chronic plantar fasciitis (CPF) is a common disease that has various treatment options. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three of these options: corticosteroid injection (CSI), extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), and radiofrequency thermal lesioning (RTL). Methods: The records of 229 patients treated with CSI (n = 81), ESWT (n = 76), or RTL (n = 72) were retrospectively analyzed. Visual analog scale scores, patient satisfaction– related success rates, repeated treatment rates, and initial treatment change rates were compared. Results: Mean ± SD follow-up was 19.0 ± 4.5 months. Baseline clinical characteristics, mean visual analog scale scores (before treatment and at months 3, 6, and 12), patient satisfaction and success rates (at months 6 and 12), and repeated treatment and initial treatment change rates were similar between treatment groups. No complications were observed after the treatments. Conclusions: All three options—CSI, ESWT, and RTL—were found to be safe and effective in treating CPF, with similar outcomes up to 1 year. Use of CSIs is advantageous because it is more accessible than the other treatments. Similarly, the noninvasive nature of ESWT is glaring among other minimally invasive options. Therefore, the first-line treatment modality of CPF can be CSI or ESWT, depending on the patient’s and physician’s joint preference; RTL treatment should be tried in patients who do not respond to these treatments. © 2023, American Podiatric Medical Association. All rights reserved.

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12364Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7547/21-049Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorYapici, Furkan
dc.contributor.authorGur, Volkan
dc.contributor.authorSari, Ilker Fatih
dc.contributor.authorKarakose, Resit
dc.contributor.authorTardus, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorUcpunar, Hanifi
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:27:16.454071564Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:27:16.454071564Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractBackground: Chronic plantar fasciitis (CPF) is a common disease that has various treatment options. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three of these options: corticosteroid injection (CSI), extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), and radiofrequency thermal lesioning (RTL). Methods: The records of 229 patients treated with CSI (n = 81), ESWT (n = 76), or RTL (n = 72) were retrospectively analyzed. Visual analog scale scores, patient satisfaction– related success rates, repeated treatment rates, and initial treatment change rates were compared. Results: Mean ± SD follow-up was 19.0 ± 4.5 months. Baseline clinical characteristics, mean visual analog scale scores (before treatment and at months 3, 6, and 12), patient satisfaction and success rates (at months 6 and 12), and repeated treatment and initial treatment change rates were similar between treatment groups. No complications were observed after the treatments. Conclusions: All three options—CSI, ESWT, and RTL—were found to be safe and effective in treating CPF, with similar outcomes up to 1 year. Use of CSIs is advantageous because it is more accessible than the other treatments. Similarly, the noninvasive nature of ESWT is glaring among other minimally invasive options. Therefore, the first-line treatment modality of CPF can be CSI or ESWT, depending on the patient’s and physician’s joint preference; RTL treatment should be tried in patients who do not respond to these treatments. © 2023, American Podiatric Medical Association. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.7547/21-049
dc.identifier.issn8750-7315
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pmid37934591
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85176389349
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12364
dc.identifier.volume113
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Podiatric Medical Association
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleWhich Treatment Method Is Better in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: Corticosteroid Injection, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, or Radiofrequency Thermal Lesioning?
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus9
rdl.department*Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Erzincan University Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan, Turkey.
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED