Which Treatment Method Is Better in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: Corticosteroid Injection, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, or Radiofrequency Thermal Lesioning?
Özet
Background: Chronic plantar fasciitis (CPF) is a common disease that has various treatment options. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three of these options: corticosteroid injection (CSI), extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), and radiofrequency thermal lesioning (RTL). Methods: The records of 229 patients treated with CSI (n = 81), ESWT (n = 76), or RTL (n = 72) were retrospectively analyzed. Visual analog scale scores, patient satisfaction– related success rates, repeated treatment rates, and initial treatment change rates were compared. Results: Mean ± SD follow-up was 19.0 ± 4.5 months. Baseline clinical characteristics, mean visual analog scale scores (before treatment and at months 3, 6, and 12), patient satisfaction and success rates (at months 6 and 12), and repeated treatment and initial treatment change rates were similar between treatment groups. No complications were observed after the treatments. Conclusions: All three options—CSI, ESWT, and RTL—were found to be safe and effective in treating CPF, with similar outcomes up to 1 year. Use of CSIs is advantageous because it is more accessible than the other treatments. Similarly, the noninvasive nature of ESWT is glaring among other minimally invasive options. Therefore, the first-line treatment modality of CPF can be CSI or ESWT, depending on the patient’s and physician’s joint preference; RTL treatment should be tried in patients who do not respond to these treatments. © 2023, American Podiatric Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Tam Kayıt
| Alan | Değer | Dil |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Yapici, Furkan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gur, Volkan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sari, Ilker Fatih | |
| dc.contributor.author | Karakose, Resit | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tardus, Ismail | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ucpunar, Hanifi | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-18T20:27:16.454071564Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-18T20:27:16.454071564Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Chronic plantar fasciitis (CPF) is a common disease that has various treatment options. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three of these options: corticosteroid injection (CSI), extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), and radiofrequency thermal lesioning (RTL). Methods: The records of 229 patients treated with CSI (n = 81), ESWT (n = 76), or RTL (n = 72) were retrospectively analyzed. Visual analog scale scores, patient satisfaction– related success rates, repeated treatment rates, and initial treatment change rates were compared. Results: Mean ± SD follow-up was 19.0 ± 4.5 months. Baseline clinical characteristics, mean visual analog scale scores (before treatment and at months 3, 6, and 12), patient satisfaction and success rates (at months 6 and 12), and repeated treatment and initial treatment change rates were similar between treatment groups. No complications were observed after the treatments. Conclusions: All three options—CSI, ESWT, and RTL—were found to be safe and effective in treating CPF, with similar outcomes up to 1 year. Use of CSIs is advantageous because it is more accessible than the other treatments. Similarly, the noninvasive nature of ESWT is glaring among other minimally invasive options. Therefore, the first-line treatment modality of CPF can be CSI or ESWT, depending on the patient’s and physician’s joint preference; RTL treatment should be tried in patients who do not respond to these treatments. © 2023, American Podiatric Medical Association. All rights reserved. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.7547/21-049 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 8750-7315 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 5 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 37934591 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85176389349 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12364 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 113 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | American Podiatric Medical Association | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.title | Which Treatment Method Is Better in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: Corticosteroid Injection, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, or Radiofrequency Thermal Lesioning? | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| rdl.citation.scopus | 9 | |
| rdl.department | *Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Erzincan University Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan, Turkey. | |
| rdl.source.index | SCOPUS | |
| rdl.source.index | PUBMED |
