Is three-point index reliable in the follow-up of the distal radius metaphys fractures in the pediatric age group?

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Three-point index (TPI), which can be used in the follow-up of conservative treatment, is an important indicator and reveals objective results about the fracture redisplacement. The hypothesis of the current study was that an initial TPI value of 0.6-0.8 may also be dangerous as it has the potential to exceed over 0.8 before a sufficient consolidation occurs and a prompt revision of the cast may prevent an upcoming displacement. This prospective controlled study 84 patients between 4 and 16 years of age, with radius distal metaphyseal fractures with more than 30% displacement or more than 15° initial angulation, were included. All of the patients in the groups had no redisplacement at 5-7 days and had TPI between 0.6 and 0.8. The patients who had cast replacement and adjusted TPI below 0.6 were included Group 1. The patients who had no cast replacement were included in Group 2. Redisplacement was observed in 8 of 38 (21%) patients in the Group 1 and in 27 of 46 (58%) patients in the Group 2 (P value 0.001). Redisplacement with cast revision was 2.8 times less (P < 0.005). The first reduction quality, fracture obliquity, renewed TPI values were found to be statistically significant for the prediction of redisplacement (P < 0.005). We recommend that the follow-up of the TPI is an important predictive factor in the conservative treatment of pediatric metaphyseal radius fractures. TPI may be renewed for protection of the fracture reduction when calculated in the gray zone which is 0.6-0.08. Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12486Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKahraman, Hamit Çaǧlayan
dc.contributor.authorŞibar, Kemal
dc.contributor.authorAlemdaroǧlu, Kadir Bahadir
dc.contributor.authorSubaşi, İzzet Özay
dc.contributor.authorGökgöz, Mehmet Burak
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:27:23.057897076Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:27:23.057897076Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractThree-point index (TPI), which can be used in the follow-up of conservative treatment, is an important indicator and reveals objective results about the fracture redisplacement. The hypothesis of the current study was that an initial TPI value of 0.6-0.8 may also be dangerous as it has the potential to exceed over 0.8 before a sufficient consolidation occurs and a prompt revision of the cast may prevent an upcoming displacement. This prospective controlled study 84 patients between 4 and 16 years of age, with radius distal metaphyseal fractures with more than 30% displacement or more than 15° initial angulation, were included. All of the patients in the groups had no redisplacement at 5-7 days and had TPI between 0.6 and 0.8. The patients who had cast replacement and adjusted TPI below 0.6 were included Group 1. The patients who had no cast replacement were included in Group 2. Redisplacement was observed in 8 of 38 (21%) patients in the Group 1 and in 27 of 46 (58%) patients in the Group 2 (P value 0.001). Redisplacement with cast revision was 2.8 times less (P < 0.005). The first reduction quality, fracture obliquity, renewed TPI values were found to be statistically significant for the prediction of redisplacement (P < 0.005). We recommend that the follow-up of the TPI is an important predictive factor in the conservative treatment of pediatric metaphyseal radius fractures. TPI may be renewed for protection of the fracture reduction when calculated in the gray zone which is 0.6-0.08. Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/bpb.0000000000001032
dc.identifier.eissn1473-5865
dc.identifier.endpage377
dc.identifier.issn1060-152X
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.pmid36377954
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85161841109
dc.identifier.startpage369
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12486
dc.identifier.volume32
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001001334200011
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Part B
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectcast index
dc.subjectdistal radius fractures
dc.subjectpediatric fractures
dc.subjectrecasting
dc.subjectthree-point index
dc.subjectCasts, Surgical
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studies
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectRadiography
dc.subjectRadius
dc.subjectRadius Fractures
dc.subjectWrist Fractures
dc.subjectsedative agent
dc.subjectadolescent
dc.subjectanthropometric parameters
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectbone radiography
dc.subjectcast application
dc.subjectclinical indicator
dc.subjectclosed fracture reduction
dc.subjectconscious sedation
dc.subjectconservative treatment
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdistal radius fracture
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfollow up
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.titleIs three-point index reliable in the follow-up of the distal radius metaphys fractures in the pediatric age group?
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus1
rdl.citation.wos1
rdl.departmentDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, Erzincan.
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)